May 24, 2016
A race!
So my order to NewEgg was for two flash disks and two cans of compressed air "dusters", and as always seems to be the case Newegg divided them into two orders and shipped from two locations.
The flash disks shipped from Oakland by Fedex overnight, and Fedex tracking says they're at the Portland sort facility and on track to deliver today "before 8 PM".
The dusters shipped from Tukwila, WA by UPS overnight, and UPS tracking says it's in Portand and on track to deliver "by end of day".
So who will win the race, Fedex or UPS? Stay tuned...
UPDATE: AND THEY'RE OFF! UPS tracking shows "Out for delivery" as of 0701.
UPDATE: Fedex shows the package at Lake Oswego as of 0817.
UPDATE: Starting from the pit lane, Fedex now reports the package on a truck out for delivery at 0852.
UPDATE: And there's the checkered flag! 1220 Fedex wins. Now to see how well these memory sticks work.
UPDATE: I might have known; like all mass storage makers, they're using 109 as a "gig" instead of 230. Windows says 468G.
UPDATE: And a 22G transfer went at 33 MB/s, compared to about 12 MB/s for the USB2 drives. I think we have a winner here.
UPDATE: And UPS limps across the finish line at 1320. And now I can go take a nap, thank goodness, because I really need one.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Daily Life at
05:33 AM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 235 words, total size 1 kb.
1
"a 22G transfer went at 33 MB/s"
That's not too shabby. Unfortunately it seems to be really hard to find speed benchmarks of flash drives, and the claimed "up to" speeds are...optimistic. It appears that most people just want cheap storage and aren't overly concerned with speed.
Posted by: RickC at May 24, 2016 06:21 PM (FvJAK)
2
Neither am I, frankly. The USB2 flash drives were painfully slow, but these new ones are acceptable.
I suspect it's the NAS that's gating this; it was never very fast.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 24, 2016 06:30 PM (+rSRq)
3
It's definitely the NAS that's throttling the transfer. I copied one of my anime directories to my local drive (about 30 MB/s), and from there to the flash drive, which was 220 MB/s.
That NAS has always crawled.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 24, 2016 07:03 PM (+rSRq)
4
And in one afternoon I backed up my entire anime collection onto these two flash disks, both of which are now full. Except I didn't back up Dragon Ball (330G) or Fairy Tail (118G).
I think I'll order a couple more of these flash drives. There's other stuff I'd like to archive.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 24, 2016 09:50 PM (+rSRq)
5
I wish Flash memory was shelf-stable... I make backups to spinning disks because I'm worried that I'll leave a Flash drive disconnected from power for too long (a year or two), and it'll stop being a backup. But then I worry that the mechanical parts of the spinning drives will fail, and those drives will stop being backups...
Anyone know a cure for chronic worrywartism? Other than multiple backups?
Posted by: Mikeski at May 24, 2016 11:01 PM (A8RoD)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 23, 2016
Bakuon -- in the future
I'm really looking forward to this:


Lime is really getting into it, baby!
It might be in the next episode, but it's probably the one after that.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in General Anime at
10:39 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 32 words, total size 1 kb.
1
For some reason that reminds me of the GuP angler fish dance.
Posted by: RickC at May 24, 2016 05:40 AM (ECH2/)
2
Maybe, but probably with a lot less gainaxing.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 24, 2016 06:29 AM (+rSRq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
This is sad
"J-Pop Idol Mayu Tomita Stabbed by Fan in Tokyo"
He stabbed her 20 times, including once in the neck. The only reason she didn't die immediately is that he was using a pocket knife. But there isn't anything else good about it. Depending on what he hit in her neck, it may be impossible for her to fully recover. With that many wounds it may be impossible anyway, and even if she can it'll take a long time.
Anyway, according to the report she hasn't regained consciousness, which is never a good sign.
(Note: there are apparently two idols with this name. This isn't the one who is in AKB48; this is the one who starred in the show "Secret Girls".)
UPDATE: Of course, there isn't anything new about rabid fans; ask John Lennon or Jodi Foster. But it's still sad when it happens.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Japanese at
06:27 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 147 words, total size 1 kb.
Bakuon ep 8 -- Punny Christmas!

It's winter and we're approaching the end of December. Which means Hijiri's birthday is coming up and soon she'll be 16 and elegible for a driver's license. In fact, she already has one. There's a country which will issue one for enough money (and if there's anything Hijiri has it's plenty of money) and the Japanese government will accept it and roll it over into a Japanese license without any test.
more...
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in General Anime at
01:34 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 439 words, total size 3 kb.
May 22, 2016
Catching up: Onigiri, Wagamama High Spec


A couple of 3-minute shows have been running for a while, so let's see what they've been up to.
more...
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in General Anime at
02:21 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 207 words, total size 2 kb.
May 21, 2016
Backups
I've been a bit worried about my lack of backups lately since my WHS died. I still have one NAS but one of the two drives in it reports as being dead. (Probably I could get it back by hitting it with the handle of a screwdriver when the power is off; likely the problem is the seek head is jammed. But it's been months and it's RAID and I don't know what would happen after that. Not worth the risk.)
A better answer is to have some other backup. A while back I bought six 128G USB2 flash disks and this evening I rolled copies of a bunch of my anime onto three of them. But you'd be surprised how few series will fit on 128G. My Railgun directory is 71G all by itself.
So another visit to NewEgg was warranted, and by damn they were selling 512G USB3 flash drives for about $250 each. So I just ordered two of them, and they're supposed to arrive on Tuesday, and we'll see how it goes.
Turns out all the USB ports on my computer are USB 3. The new drives are nominally rated 250MB/s write speed. I don't expect to make that, but surely these will be faster than the USB2 sticks I bought last time, which have been averaging about 12MB/s.
One reason I won't reach 250MB/s is that my NAS, where my anime is stored, can't feed data to me that fast. But it surely can exceed 12 MB/s.
I hope.
Regardless, even if these new drives are not very fast, this is 1TB of reliable storage that can't lock up because of a sticking seek head. And that's worthwhile all by itself.
(Oh, and by the way: this post is not a request for suggestions or advice. Just thought I'd mention that.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Computers at
08:29 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 307 words, total size 2 kb.
1
After suffering a couple of catastrophic disk failures, I now have (pauses to count) fifteen external drives ranging from 2TB to 5TB each. Every few months I buy another one (they keep getting cheaper) and back up everything that's either new or important.
And so far I haven't needed any of them.
I used to back up to DVD-R, but hard disks are now cheaper and
much easier.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 21, 2016 11:41 PM (PiXy!)
2
Individual large files will probably go as fast as the drive itself can support. I have a USB3 flash drive with a sustained write speed of about 40MB/s, which is pretty nice if you're not sending tens of gigs around. The read speed off that drive is somewhere north of 100MB/s, as far as I can tell.
What a time to be alive, huh?
Posted by: RickC at May 22, 2016 11:24 AM (FvJAK)
3
Transferring MKV files did go somewhat faster. What went slowly was my manga archives, which are swarms of JPG files. For instance, my Fairy Tail manga archive is 5600 files.
Another thing that helped was reformatting the flash drive to NTFS away from ex-FAT. FAT is a miserably badly designed disk format that dates back to when PC's had 16-bit processors and storage was floppy disks. ex-FAT is a modernized version designed to handle larger storage devices, but it still has serious problems. But the flash drives come with that format because it's more cross-platform.
NTFS is drastically better; not only is it more resilient but it's faster, too. And I don't care if Mac users have trouble reading my flash drives because I don't expect it will ever happen. Plus none of my Android devices have USB interfaces.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 22, 2016 12:27 PM (+rSRq)
4
I've found my USB3 storage devices have problems with very small things and very large things. For example, sending 100 8mb music files, or a single 5GB F1 race, to a USB3 flash drive takes forever.
But 10 400mb MKVs? No sweat.
Posted by: Wonderduck at May 22, 2016 07:54 PM (XQ5ac)
5
You were probably using ex-FAT. I think NTFS won't have a similar problem. (I sure hope not; all my manga JPGs are like 100 KB.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 22, 2016 08:54 PM (+rSRq)
6
Slightly OT heads up: My sister's laptop just automatically went into the Windows 10 update cycle. Apparently it doesn't prompt you anymore, you are supposed to go into the GWX nagware and "reschedule" your "scheduled" upgrade.
On my machines, I've disabled windows update and ripped out all the GWX.exe related updates, but my sister tends to go with default settings.
Posted by: EccentricOrbit at May 23, 2016 06:35 AM (GtPd7)
7
There have been "optional" updates the last couple of weeks relating to Win 10. From now on, it is my policy to click "get more information" for every optional update before allowing it to install.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 23, 2016 07:29 AM (+rSRq)
8
My policy is Windows 7, until they don't make anything for it anymore.
Posted by: ubu at May 23, 2016 09:38 AM (h7lSl)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
Here's a news flash from our Vice President
The most important thing about an army is how diverse its soldiers are.
We'll win future wars because our enemies will look at the Army and say, "Hey, they have lots of women and homosexuals in the ranks. We better surrender."
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Rants at
12:59 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 49 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's gotten to the point where all I can say is, I just defend this country. I don't pretend to understand it.
Posted by: CatCube at May 21, 2016 03:16 PM (fa4fh)
2
It could be worse. The GOP Senate just confirmed a 'fabulous' guy to be the new Secretary of the Army, who has expressed, as one of his primary motivations in office, as increasing the number of transgender members in the Army (The quoted list of his priorities as given during his confirmation hearings had exactly one bullet point that should actually be a priority for a SecArmy.).
Posted by: cxt217 at May 21, 2016 05:13 PM (Zoe4h)
3
The only saving grace there is that the current Secretary of Defense doesn't seem to be an SJW-idiot, and the Secretary of the Army works for him. But it's not much of a consolation given that the Secretary of Defense works for the President.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 21, 2016 05:42 PM (+rSRq)
4
But it's not much of a consolation given that the Secretary of Defense works for the President.
That is the major problem (Aside from the difference that I have far less confidence in Ashton Carter than you do.). Unless you have a Melvin Laird as SecDef (And while Laird was not the worst SecDef ever - Louis Johnson holds that position and is a classic example of why officials should be glad we do not put incompetent and stupid ones on trial, because Johnson would have been shot for what he was guilty of - he was still an awful SecDef.), it will be a good company/party man in the position. So whenever SecDef is occupied by an 'adult' in an administration of children (Like how Robert Gates was likened in the Obama Administration.), all that happens is that the SecDef becomes an enabler and excuse-maker for the administration, akin to an adult enabler handing out alcohol and car keys to the underage children in the room. Robert Gates is a perfect example of the phenomena and his post-administration attempts at trying to spin away his responsibilities for the mess he allowed to happen is unconvincing, to say the least.
And yes, I hate to say, but I rank Leon Panetta as a better SecDef than Gates, because Panetta, for all his problems, was more willing to fight for the military than Gates ever did.
Posted by: cxt217 at May 21, 2016 06:46 PM (Zoe4h)
5
One of Obummer's greatest accomplishments (and I use the term ironically) is the hollowing out of the remains of our military. We now have the military of the WWII Germans and Japanese. Great stuff, but not enough of it. They lost against opponents that could throw more men and material at them, and were in the end, more results-oriented.
My liberal friend sees the Air Force scrounging for parts, and says "good thing! They need to learn to live within a budget!" I see a force that has to be sensitive to the loss of a single plane; a force that will shatter when it starts taking real losses in, you know, a war.
Posted by: ubu at May 23, 2016 09:44 AM (h7lSl)
6
I'm not entirely convinced that we're in the same situation that we were in the Cold War, where we needed to maintain a vast military that was constantly ready to take on a gigantic foe.
Fact is, anyone who's got the military to make us even -reach- a war footing also has nuclear weapons. We're not going to get into a knock-down, drag-out, commit-everything fight with the Russians because of MAD, and that isn't dependent on us having a massive superiority in n-th generation fighter planes. Ditto for China though in their case our biggest deterrent is naval, and you can't really say we've been skimping there (especially in comparison to potential opposition!)
It's worth saying that we should probably change some of our military procurement away from "the absolute best performance money can buy, if you're willing to spend a billion bucks on a plane" and more towards "cheap and cheerful" that we can have a large inventory of on the cheap. We don't need the F-22 to take on guys driving converted pickup trucks.
I do think that if we're going to draw down forces, we should also pull in some of our security commitments as well.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at May 23, 2016 11:34 AM (v29Tn)
7
I'm not entirely convinced that we're in the same situation that we were in the Cold War, where we needed to maintain a vast military that was constantly ready to take on a gigantic foe.
On the contrary, given the disappearance of a single, monolithic opponent, the US military probably needs to be larger than most people think to handle the variety of threats either present or on the horizon.
It is ironic that having just one major foe may actually make military spending 'efficient' because you only have to deal with that single foe.
Fact is, anyone who's got the military to make us even -reach- a war footing also has nuclear weapons. We're not going to get into a knock-down, drag-out, commit-everything fight with the Russians because of MAD,
You would hope so - but reality have a disagreeable tendency to prove wrong. In any case, depending on the possession of nukes to stop war from beginning at all in place of conventional forces, was a bad idea when Eisenhower was cutting conventional forces because his plan was to let theater commanders use nuclear weapons in extremis. It has not gotten any better now.
That is not even getting to how limited war scenarios (i.e. against nations whose military is not as capable as ours'.) can generate shocks. Argentina was suppose to be a limited war opponent to the United Kingdom in the Falklands War - yet it was the British that got shocked.
and that isn't dependent on us having a massive superiority in n-th generation fighter planes.
Except that the American way of making war (As well as to keep war from our coast and in the enemies' den.) depends almost entirely air and naval superiority. Given the European tendency to sell their best weapons to the highest bidder, and the money that the PRC is investing in their air force, I would not want to go in confidence with this belief.
And since air forces have to prepare for what the likely threats will have down the road, being complacent with F-15s and F-16s is not a good idea.
Ditto for China though in their case our biggest deterrent is naval, and you can't really say we've been skimping there (especially in comparison to potential opposition!)
Except we are skimping on the Navy. The Navy is facing almost a big a shortfall as the Air Force is - not helped by the Navy being obscured by the other armed forces since the end of the Cold War. In any case, both the Navy and Air Force are needed against the PRC - and both are hurting the most right now.
It's worth saying that we should probably change some of our military procurement away from "the absolute best performance money can buy, if you're willing to spend a billion bucks on a plane" and more towards "cheap and cheerful" that we can have a large inventory of on the cheap. We don't need the F-22 to take on guys driving converted pickup trucks.
We can definitely change how procurement is handled, but if you structure your entire force around the cheap on the assumption that you will be taking on no one except guys in technicals for the next twenty years, the next time you actually get into a fight with a decent air force will be the moment when you wish you had the F-22s to back you up. That is not even getting to the part where you have to explain to the guy or girl killed while operating the cheap fighter why you did not send them out in the best that money can buy...
I do think that if we're going to draw down forces, we should also pull in some of our security commitments as well.
That would be nice, except the Real World (TM) usually refuses to cooperate. Shades of the quote attributed to Trotsky, "You may not be interested in war but war is interested in you."
Posted by: cxt217 at May 23, 2016 01:06 PM (Zoe4h)
8
Sorry, guys, I think this is enough.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 23, 2016 01:37 PM (+rSRq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 20, 2016
Why are we watching?
(Yes, this post is about anime, so stick with me.)
May I introduce B.F. Skinner? He did critical work in understanding conditioning. Everyone has heard of Pavlov's Dogs, but that had to do with low level neural circuits and its practical application is extremely limited.
Not so Skinner's work. He was studying processes which happen at the highest levels of the brain. It's known as "operant conditioning" and it's extremely powerful. It has to do with reinforcement: the person who is training you is trying to achieve certain results, and he uses rewards to make you comply.
It's more complex than that, however. How does the operator get across what he wants the subject to do? You start by rewarding behavior which is close to what you want, and get more and more specific as time goes on.
You want the pigeon to peck the keyboard of a toy piano. So the first thing you do is to starve the pigeon so it's voraciously hungry. The pigeon wanders close to the piano, and you dump some food in a hopper which the pigeon immediately eats. But it wants more, so it wanders back to the piano and when it gets a lot closer, you reward it with more food. It goes like that; eventually you reward it when it puts its head near the keyboard, and you reward it for pecking the keyboard, and so on.
Quite complex behaviors can be induced this way. And they can be reinforced really very strongly. He also studied "schedules of reinforcement" and came up with some surprising results. "Continuous reinforcement" is what you use when first teaching the desired behavior but it isn't very effective at maintaining it.
The most effective schedule of reinforcement is to reward randomly, with varying amounts of reward. Small rewards more commonly, and bigger rewards more rarely. If the reward schedule is consistent, the subject knows each time whether there will be a reward. But if the schedule is random, then he thinks, "Well, maybe this time it'll hit."
Skinner's work was anticipated by tinkerers a hundred years before him, when they invented the slot machine. It turns out to be a nearly perfect device for teaching people to stick coins in the machine.
So what has this got to do with anime? Wonderduck asks, "Why are we watching?" when really excellent shows come around so rarely and unexpectedly?
The answer is that we've been conditioned. Smaller rewards more often (shows which are good but not great) and an occasional masterpiece without warning -- isn't that exactly like a slot machine?
Which makes us think, "Well, one more try; maybe this one will turn out to hit the jackpot!"
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Engineer's Disease at
08:56 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 455 words, total size 3 kb.
May 19, 2016
We did it!
My fellow Americans, we have exceeded parity! There are now 11 guns in private hands in this country for every 10 Americans!
And all because of Obama. Every time he starts talking about "common sense gun control" gun sales go up another notch. Ammo.com declares Obama to be the greatest gun salesman in America, and I think they have a point.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in linky at
05:08 PM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 64 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's been a pretty clear sign that a significant portion of the country figured out he couldn't be trusted about half way through 2009. Though the ammo shortage has more to do with overtures that the Democrat-controlled Congress made, which started a rolling over-buying, which lead to still running shortages.
(Granted, the Obama Administration also botched up a lot of the core components of several important cancer medications and nearly lead to a critical shortage there, as well. But the media couldn't bring themselves to ever write those stories honestly.)
Posted by: sqa at May 19, 2016 08:25 PM (If+FS)
2
Unfortunately, most guns are concentrated in the hands of small number of gun collectors. So, we still have a pitifully small ratio of gun owners for the population.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at May 19, 2016 09:19 PM (XOPVE)
3
Even Gallup polls still claim 41% of US households have at least one gun, and it seems reasonable to assume quite a few are refusing to answer. And there's still plenty of data supporting an increase in first-time buyers, especially women.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at May 20, 2016 12:09 PM (eRXAl)
4
The graphic I linked to says,
More than 20% of firearm owners have purchased their first firearm within the last five years.
There are certainly a lot of people yet who don't own guns, but the image of the lone crazy who owns an entire arsenal is left-wing propaganda. (Yeah, there are a few such people but they don't own the lion's share of firearms in private hands.)
Gun ownership is mainstream and always has been.These sales figures are real, and politicians know about them. It's people voting with their wallets, to the tune of several hundred dollars each, and that's a pretty heart-felt vote. And the longer it goes on, the louder it speaks. Tens of millions of people are making very clear they don't want to lose their Second Amendment rights, not by demonstrating in the streets, but by quietly visiting gun stores and spending money there.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 20, 2016 12:56 PM (+rSRq)
5
I remember about 15 years ago, a relative of mine had expressed doubt about the percentage of households with at least one gun. She'd grown up in a house with guns, but hadn't had one around since then. Her husband coughed quietly, and then told her about his bolt-action .22 (securely stored where no curious grandchildren could get to it). They'd been through two or three moves without her ever noticing it.
...and now she's encouraging him to pick up something a bit more appropriate for protection.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at May 20, 2016 07:28 PM (eRXAl)
6
Well, that's comforting. I wish to see a gistogram, but that is not possible to know without a massive registration effort. Although... It should be knowable in strict registration states like Maryland, minus gangbangers.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at May 21, 2016 09:01 PM (XOPVE)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 21, 2016 09:40 PM (+rSRq)
8
The numbers in that graphic are not useful. They just took 42 percent of the total US population, ignoring the 74 million children (and the 5.8 million felons...). Gallup polling claims 46% of adult men and 23% of adult women own guns, which would give ~87 million. I'd treat that as a lower bound, given the politics, but 136 million looks way too high.
...unless the Democrats win this year...
-j
Posted by: J Greely at May 22, 2016 04:18 AM (eRXAl)
9
I think nobody knows for sure. And I suspect that's a good thing.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 22, 2016 09:24 AM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at June 01, 2016 07:49 AM (XOPVE)
11
James, now a happy resident of Texas (but he hasn't been through a summer there yet), just bought
a new carry gun.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at June 01, 2016 01:30 PM (+rSRq)
12
I've got little reason to lie about it; The government knows of at least *some* of my guns, and as I'm living in South Carolina now, I'd be more of an outlier if I didn't own any.
The polling figures for gun ownership are undoubtedly on the low side, and I'm pretty sure the figures for how many guns are owned on average are substantially low, too.
Posted by: Brett Bellmore at June 01, 2016 01:36 PM (l55xw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 18, 2016
21st Century Headlines
"Man admits to using gun in SE Portland hoverboard robbery, records show"
Hoverboard robbery? It must be the future already. I didn't know anyone was selling hoverboards yet.
UPDATE: Sigh; apparently they don't actually hover. It's like a segway without the handlebars.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Weird World at
08:56 PM
| Comments (5)
| Add Comment
Post contains 45 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah, it's really lame, the way they've taken to calling chopped off Segways "hoverboards".
They've got actual hoverboards out there, of course. But, as you'd expect, they one work over highly conductive surfaces, and the battery life isn't all that great. AC inductive repulsion eats batteries fast.
And skateboards actually work better.
Posted by: Brett Bellmore at May 19, 2016 02:10 AM (l55xw)
2
There are actual flying hoverboards that have been built. This one Canadian built one that he used to hover over a lake. They are lift-fan devices (battery powered in his case.)
Other people have been building gas powered lift-fan hoverbikes and the like.
Posted by: EccentricOrbit at May 23, 2016 06:30 AM (GtPd7)
3
I think this is a link to the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AUq3mBuENiw
Posted by: EccentricOrbit at May 23, 2016 06:31 AM (GtPd7)
4
Catalin Alexandru Duru.
Posted by: EccentricOrbit at May 23, 2016 06:32 AM (GtPd7)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 23, 2016 07:26 AM (+rSRq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
50kb generated in CPU 0.0341, elapsed 0.2475 seconds.
46 queries taking 0.2295 seconds, 117 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.