November 11, 2009
By Jove, I do believe it's a Pushme-Pullyu.
November 03, 2009
Shamus is writing about how everything he needs to know, he learns from Champions Online. In this edition he writes about Canada, America's Neighbor to the North.
He encountered a catgirl. I find myself wanting to call her "foxy", except that she's a catgirl, not a doggy girl. Anyway, she really looks good. She also looks like she ought to be freezing to death, considering how skimpy her costume is and the fact that there's snow all over everything. I get the impression that the national flower of Canada is the snowflake.
September 08, 2009
The rule is that if a high school girl wears glasses, then she's brainy and she's a repressed volcano of passion. But if a high school boy wears glasses then he's a dork.
Meet the dork. His name is Tetsurou. He's been granted a full scholarship to attend the Whatsis academy, and is arriving today for his first day there. It doesn't turn out to be quite what he expects: he's the only boy in what appears to be a girls' school. Why he was brought there is a mystery but there seems to be a reason, one that's secret.
The rest of this is below the fold.more...
Posted by: J Greely at September 09, 2009 06:44 AM (2XtN5)
I haven't seen any lolis. None at all.
The licensing company did make a deal to allow a dubbed version to be shown by Joost, but that appears to be the only R1 release of the title. As far as I can tell it never saw DVDs.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at September 09, 2009 08:08 AM (+rSRq)
No idea how true it is. They apparently came up with a Gainax ending, but I don't know any details.
Posted by: J Greely at September 09, 2009 10:38 AM (9Nz6c)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at September 09, 2009 01:05 PM (+rSRq)
And if SS has issues with that, they'd better not be doing Bakamonogatari, or they'll freak when they hit episode 9...(link probably NSFW)
Posted by: ubu at September 09, 2009 03:32 PM (fH0L/)
August 05, 2009
A couple of things about Nanoha that have always bugged me. First, what is Chrono's title? They translate it as "enforcer". It sounds to me like tsumakan or something like that, but I can't make any sense of it.
Second, what is Fate holding here?
Is that supposed to be an artichoke? Or some kind of melon? (If it's a melon, it's a pretty darned strong one. A few seconds after that grab, Amy drops it about 4 feet onto a hard floor, and it doesn't break.)
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at August 05, 2009 10:16 AM (/ppBw)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 05, 2009 10:26 AM (+rSRq)
Posted by: TimF at August 05, 2009 10:39 AM (9QRdA)
And most are surprisingly misnamed, since they're very hard to squash. (I'm likely to start with a meat cleaver against a raw one... they're a lot of work even with a big chef's knife.) Structurally similar to a pumpkin though... stringy seed glob surrounded by "meat" surrounded by waxy skin. Squash are much denser and much thicker-walled than the jack-o-lantern/pumpkin-pie variety, so you could probably drop one ala MSLNA's and not do more than bruise it lightly.
Based on watching Iron Chef, the Japanese might use the same word for what Americans separately call "pumpkins" and "squash". (Either they actually do, or the translators/dubbers for Iron Chef messed it up... what were clearly squash on that show got called "pumpkins".)
Posted by: Mikeski at August 05, 2009 12:04 PM (CT8LT)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 05, 2009 12:13 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 05, 2009 12:14 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Mikeski at August 05, 2009 01:48 PM (GbSQF)
And yes, they are hard as hell. I bet they'd survive a trip to the kitchen floor 99% of the time.
Posted by: Toren at August 05, 2009 02:05 PM (T8y65)
Posted by: Mikeski at August 05, 2009 02:34 PM (GbSQF)
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at August 05, 2009 02:36 PM (/ppBw)
Sorry, folks. If I had some sort of tool, that worked, with which I could extract out a small segment of a video file I'd post an example.
But the only thing I have which does that is Vidomi, and getting the audio to work with that is always hit-or-miss. I've pretty much given up on it. (About three quarters of the time the result is audio which warbles, i.e. an audio codec mis-code.)
I downloaded Handbrake, and it works really well, but only for transcoding full files. As far as I can tell it doesn't have any way to extract out a small subsection. (Or if it does, it has to be done using the CLI and there I do not wish to go!)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 05, 2009 02:55 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: HC at August 05, 2009 03:43 PM (y+7vV)
OK, dig out the old dictionary...
執務 shitsumu means "performance of one's official duties"
官 kan means "government service"
So it sounds a lot like it means "bureaucrat". But almost certainly it's not intended to be read literally.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 05, 2009 04:34 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 05, 2009 04:34 PM (+rSRq)
I suspect the translator saw the term in the fansub and decided to go with it; too much of a coincidence otherwise. Eh, it works for me.
The TSAB seems to have easy transitions between branches, far more than most Earth militaries. Chrono is an Enforcer in A's but an admiral by Strikers, and all of the aces swap services at least once.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at August 05, 2009 04:50 PM (pWQz4)
Add to that a smattering of the old school British navy command independency ( due to communication speed limits ), and there you go.
( well, its not strictly due to comm lag, per se, but interdimensional travel seems to be of widely varying speed and safety, and that applies to comms too. . . so being cut off is not unlikely, particularly in the situations TSAB fleets and operatives would be expected to deal with )
Posted by: metaphysician at August 05, 2009 05:39 PM (M5Kik)
The whole business of them using kids like that was always a bit creepy. The reason for it was easy: it's a mahou shoujo show, so of course the protagonist has to be a kid.
But you could retcon it with the same logic that Strike Witches used: the power of a mage peaks in their mid-teens. That wouldn't explain why Precia was so damned strong, but maybe she was even stronger when she was young.
Anyway, if that was true, then you couldn't really afford to wait until age 18 to recruit promising mages like Chrono. At age 18 his best years (as a mage, anyway) would already be behind him.
I'm not arguing that the series plotters had that in mind. Just it's one way of explaining it for the first two series.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 05, 2009 05:56 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: metaphysician at August 05, 2009 07:27 PM (M5Kik)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 05, 2009 07:52 PM (+rSRq)
Does anyone know how close the manga and the anime stick to each other? It's kind of hard to figure that kind of thing out from the wiki's without getting hugely spoiled.
Posted by: David at August 05, 2009 10:21 PM (n/RK7)
That said, Fate and Nanoha joining up at that age was just plumb abnormal - Teana and Subaru don't start formal military training until 13 or 14, and don't actually get a posting to a real unit until 16 (and that wouldn't have been much more than a militia unit, with their abilities, if they hadn't been headhunted at the beginning of Strikers.) Still a little younger than we run things, but not so far out there. Elio and Caro are younger, but they're atypical in their own ways.
It's -really- clear that in certain ways, the TSAB is a lot looser than a normal military organization. No prohibitions on nepotism at all - not just Chrono, but Admiral Leti's son too, as well as Subaru's dad and sister. Which makes sense if you're running your army as a big social network. We have good reason to believe that magical ability is hereditary; strong mages are rare and the TSAB has good reason to surround them with other strong mages at that time of life and encourage, heh, the production of more strong mages.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at August 05, 2009 10:27 PM (vGfoR)
The manga that's out there is mostly meant to supplement the anime, so it's "some stuff that happened between S1 and A's" and "some stuff that happened after A's and before Strikers." It's apparently canonical. There's even a chapter that focuses on the bad guys in Strikers, kind of like a Yagami family episode from A's, that was released right in the middle of Strikers.
There are two new Nanoha manga series: Vivid, which is the Vivio story (you don't know who she is and there's no way to explain it without massively spoiling Strikers), and Force, which looks to be more serious in tone and might not feature as much in the way of old cast. Vivid's pretty light material so far, lots of "where are they now" fanservice.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at August 05, 2009 10:33 PM (vGfoR)
In our society, due to a combination of how children are sometimes raised, child labor laws, and the screwed up nature of our educational system, we tend to delay every form of maturity except maybe for physical and sexual. A lot of people aren't really good until say 25 or 30, and some never reach it. Other societies have had massively different standards. (Except for physical, as that process does not seem to vary so much.) One example that comes to mind is the goose boy or shepherd boy, who fulfills adult levels of responsibility while still being to small of frame for more difficult tasks.
In Mid society, this seems to be different. Up until watching Nanoha, I had always considered 10 a good practical minimum military age. Besides the skill with which the creators have presented their hard work, there are a few reasons why I found it so convincing. 1. The high intelligence, good grades, and language abilities of the young powerful mages have convinced me that the magical technology allows for earlier and more rapid education. For example, a telepathic interface might allow the understanding of complicated writing and the operation of complicated computers before they would otherwise be able to write. Nanoha is still a freak by this criteria, but maybe not as bad as Tom Kratman. (I do expect that the Mid Kids in the military do not have as broad an education as they might otherwise.)
2. Responsibility comes from partly from being in a position to succeed or fail, where not failing is important. Mid Kids with powerful magic are in a position to do as much harm as an adult, perhaps an armed adult. If they could not develop restraint to the extent that armed adults do, it would be a very different series. (Disturbed magical child 'soldiers', of the Joseph Kony/Nepal Maoist kind might be as reasonable a story to tell, but I doubt very much that any of us would like it.) 2b A fanfic author I know has postulated that magic drastically increases the mental maturation rate by altering the internal mechanisms. I don't feel this is actually has to happen for everything to make sense, and for them to be satisfying for me.
3. Normal militaries tend to be made up by very young people backed up by or using as cadre much older people. If there is some acceleration of maturity do to education, culture and life style, then there is might not be all that much functional difference between the TSABs general 14ish versus the US Military 17. In real life those two or three years are very important. Without faster development of some sort as a general rule, the TSAB may just be happy with the drawbacks. If they are a small fraction of the organization, they might not get out of hand, and the leadership might just want some people who will do what they are told without thinking about it, ala the HJ.
4. The very young and very powerful mages who star in Nanoha are pretty clearly not statistically representative of the TSAB as a whole. Generally they are *Spoiler*, raised abnormally, warped by growing up with unusual at an early age, and/or just a monster in general. There also seems to be an implication that precocious brightness and discipline are also needed to develop magic power beyond a certain point when young.
Posted by: PatBuckman at August 06, 2009 02:32 PM (9PeMI)
In addition, the TSAB is not really a warfighting organization. I imagine that like for the third world militaries, the TSAB has elements of a jobs program for powerful mages who would otherwise be unemployed and a danger to the regime. Since they already need a low minimum legal age so they can stop some overpowered runt from cracking the universe because the voices tell them to, lowering the military age to the one where practicality suggests they can be held responsible for their actions seems a bit of a no brainer. I imagine that the older and more competent heads give the ones who cannot justify the position on their own merits make work to keep them busy and learning until they are more trustworthy.
It has been said about getting into the modern American military, that there is a waiver for everything except for not being well enough educated. Given everything else in the series, I would expect the TSAB to have a much lower minimum age for the form parents sign to allow their young children to enlist. Given what Triangle Hearts reveals, I imagine the Takamichis would have signed, and every other young person so enrolled is either an orphan (and hence legally competent to sign for themselves) or under the guardianship of someone who would sign.
I suspect that I may be overthinking things. Or it may be that I was an unusually incompetent child, and I don't see much difference between Nanoha Takamichi and Dido Twite.
Posted by: PatBuckman at August 06, 2009 02:34 PM (9PeMI)
We do know that kids with magical talent in Mid itself are identified early, and have special schools available to them; on the other hand, at least at young-Nanoha's age, they're not in any sort of military or even pre-military.
It could just be a case of rarity. Nanoha and Fate, and Hayate especially, are powerful enough that the TSAB just can't afford not to use them where it can, even if two of them are former OPFOR. AAA-ranked mages are thin on the ground (S-ranked even thinner, of course), and doubtless there are more calls for that kind of ability than people to fill the slots. There's a long, long distance between AAA-rank and plain ol' A-rank; Signum and Vita (AAA themselves) were a match for any number of the mooks they encounter in A's (and we know they're minimum A-rank themselves).
Too many A's!
If it's a question between "get fifty long-service men killed for nothing" or "send in the loli", well, I'll hold her stuffed bunny. ;p
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at August 06, 2009 06:15 PM (pWQz4)
Co-opting them into your force and dealing with any consequences seems far preferable to me than ending up using other already scarce high powered magic users to keep an eye on them and make sure they don't get into trouble.
Posted by: David at August 06, 2009 08:06 PM (n/RK7)
Posted by: metaphysician at August 06, 2009 08:42 PM (M5Kik)
metaphysician: They have limiters, but I imagine people with the technical knowledge can break them. Then I imagine there would be some who would be tempted to use their hard earned skills to make money on the private market, ala the Russian/Soviet security forces and the Mafia. Lay offs cause a spike in organized crime, especially youngsters that don't have any salable skills other than fighting.
Not employing Nanoha or leaving either Fate or Hayate in prison might have had bad long term consequences for the stability of midchilda society. Idle hands, grudges and alienating salvagable fighters have taken down more than one real world government, even without the overpowered kiddies.
Posted by: PatBuckman at August 06, 2009 10:34 PM (9PeMI)
(TSAB prisons are NOT nice facilities, and are kept in orbit around uninhabited planets.)
"Device control" doesn't work either, because the technology isn't secret, the tools aren't unavailable, and it's a big multiverse. Precia was able to make a device for Fate without much trouble. We know that minor mages have devices without the full capabilities of an Intelligent Device like RH, but which operate on the same principles.
So yes, it's probably much more effective to co-opt them than it is to try to stop them. (The appropriate metaphor is wholly inappropriate for use in a conversation about magical girls, but you get the idea.)
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at August 06, 2009 10:37 PM (vGfoR)
IOW, hard enough to keep such from being done by inmates in high security prison; utterly impossible regarding the general populace.
P.S.: *looks around sheepishly* What? I really like Nanoha, and don't mind extensive world debates.
Posted by: metaphysician at August 07, 2009 08:46 AM (M5Kik)
It does not take a long cultural immersion to become somewhat skilled with a gun. (Now, the most effective soldiers, regardless of weapons system, seem to need a cultural and institutional heritage to really develop.) It is not clear what the case is with devices. On the one hand, they were originally alien to Nanoha. On the other hand, she is a freak, and the basic teachings of the Takamichi sword style may be usefully similar to say Lindy's combat mage style. It is said, to get a longbowman, start with his grandfather, and swordsmen seem to take at least a lifetime.
Mainly, I think the device protects and enhances an already dangerous as a weapon combat mage rather than being a complete weapons system in its own right. Remember Nanoha bouncing the can at the start of A's? Well funded top of the line soldiers and warriors will pay quite a lot for effective armor, even if it doesn't do anything for their ability to cut people down. While all of the characters tend to be top of the line, and well funded, I am not trying to argue the power of the mages versus that of the devices to that extent.
I also seem to recall something in one of the mangas about the TSAB knowing of 4-5-6 hundred different methods of magic. I think I've seen about six, which implies that there may be some quite deadly deviceless methods. And then there are all the mages floating around that can't really be disarmed that way without near killing them.
Posted by: PatBuckman at August 07, 2009 11:28 AM (9PeMI)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 07, 2009 11:43 AM (+rSRq)
July 13, 2009
On the other hand, I thought Order of the Phoenix, book five, made a good movie despite being such a long book. A lot of that length is Harry being an angsty teenager, and the story is both shorter and more enjoyable without it.
Posted by: ngthagg at July 13, 2009 10:23 PM (AXxiE)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at July 14, 2009 06:45 AM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Mark at July 14, 2009 07:48 AM (aUPJJ)
Posted by: David at July 14, 2009 08:51 AM (n/RK7)
Posted by: dkallen99 at July 14, 2009 09:32 AM (1PFDl)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at July 14, 2009 11:13 AM (+rSRq)
Just went to the store for more eggs. I eat four every morning, so I go through them fast. Also needed bread and garbage bags. And I bought a couple of room thermometers.
While I was looking for the thermometers, I wandered past the electronics section. They had a big TV with the sound turned off playing a rendered movie I'd never seen before and didn't recognize. Something about a little girl on one of those motorized skateboards with a steering handle, and a super-powered white dog. They were being chased by bad guys in helicopters and on motorcycles, in a mad dash through city traffic. After they think they've lost all the pursuers, a whole army appears just in front of them. The dog wipes them out with a super-powered bark. What I watched was awesome.
So I decided to buy it. $17. And then I got home and looked it up, and found out that the part I was watching was, effectively, a fantasy sequence. Turns out the little girl and the dog are stars of a TV show, and that was a part of the show. Turns out the dog isn't super powered, but he thinks he is, and most of the movie is about him finding out that he isn't, after he runs away.
Turns out his voice is John Travolta.
Turns out I won't be watching this. Ick. That's what I get for giving in on impulse buys.
Posted by: David at July 13, 2009 04:52 PM (n/RK7)
What I saw, and wanted to watch, was a story about a superpowered dog and a girl with nifty high tech gizmos.
What I didn't want was a Disney road movie about someone who is out of touch with reality.
I didn't want to watch this movie. I wanted to watch the TV show the girl and dog were in. That's what I saw at the store, and I wanted to watch that story.
I know from what I read that there are other scenes from the TV show in the movie, but that's not the point.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at July 13, 2009 05:18 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: atomic_fungus at July 13, 2009 05:34 PM (aIXiG)
Ah, well... the odds of Disney successfully pulling off that awesome movie anyhow are pretty low. Dreamworks maybe and Pixar for sure (and yes, I know Pixar is owned by Disney but it's still not the same), but not Disney.
Posted by: Jeremy Bowers at July 13, 2009 05:42 PM (1Gr9l)
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at July 13, 2009 06:09 PM (/ppBw)
Posted by: David at July 13, 2009 07:08 PM (n/RK7)
I notice the common factor seems to be that they're Disney productions.
Posted by: pgfraering at July 13, 2009 09:11 PM (9ZKsr)
Notice the relative absense of Eddie Murphy's character.
Posted by: pgfraering at July 13, 2009 09:16 PM (9ZKsr)
May 20, 2009
Fledge is reminiscing about waiting in line to see Star Wars ep 1, ten years ago when it came out.
I remember when I saw ep 4 for the first time. (At the Westgate Theater, in Beaverton OR, which seems to have been torn down while I was away.) It wasn't opening day, but I think it was that weekend. And in particular it was before all the buzz began. Star Wars wasn't yet a legend, wasn't yet a franchise. It was just a new SF movie, a bit retro, not really yet on the radar. It was still something of a geek movie, not yet the breakout hit it eventually became.
I'd seen trailers for it, and amongst us young engineers working at Tektronix at the time there was pretty firm consensus that it had to be seen. But no one really knew what it was. No one I knew saw it before I went. I was expecting to be entertained but I wasn't expecting what really happened, what I really experienced.
Of course it blew me away. But what I remember most was that when the Death Star exploded, the way the audience burst into applause. I don't think I've ever heard an audience do that, before or since.
That was my second year after leaving college. I think Fledge might be too young to remember that weekend, 32 years ago.
When the original came out, I was 8 or 9 years old. When the Death Star went 'boom', the crowd went nuts and I was hooked. I eventually saw it 12 more times in the theatre. It's actually the first film I remember seeing.
Come to think of it... I think I've only seen it once since then, when I forced Ph.Duck to watch it for the first time a few years back.
Posted by: Wonderduck at May 20, 2009 10:00 PM (hlGBx)
Posted by: Doyen at May 20, 2009 10:14 PM (GTo9u)
The Westgate was one of the early multiplexes, back when they started taking big theaters and subdividing them. It has one big screen and several small ones, and Star Wars was on the big screen.
There wasn't any line when I saw it. In fact, the theater wasn't even full. It was like a Saturday afternoon showing the first weekend.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 20, 2009 10:23 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Tiberius at May 21, 2009 03:49 AM (TXmvK)
Posted by: azizhp at May 21, 2009 07:28 AM (UKXf2)
And yeah, the (full house) preview crowd cheered. Multiple times. Just like a Saturday afternoon kids' show.
Posted by: Old Grouch at May 21, 2009 08:24 AM (TTce3)
Posted by: madmike at May 21, 2009 09:00 AM (F0SXU)
Then, it only got worse, when HBO started showing Ep 4 almost non-stop for free on C-Band satellite around 1986 (a few years before they came up with scramblers and started charging money).
Posted by: BigD at May 21, 2009 09:05 AM (LjWr8)
Star Wars... I never saw the original three in the theater at all ('course, the first one I wasn't around for). Played the VHS until they wore out, though. Waited in line for ep 1, and shouldn't have bothered; 2 and 3 were perfectly all right in the sense that they were worth the price of admission in an entertainment sense, but they weren't worthy of the name.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at May 21, 2009 09:39 AM (vGfoR)
Posted by: ColoradoJim at May 21, 2009 10:12 AM (AkBlA)
There was actually one other case where I saw that kind of audience reaction.
I went to a wargame convention in SF one time, and they showed "Waterloo". The crowd treated it like a sports event, and (of course!) were rooting for the French. So, for instance, they cheered when the French lancers counter-charged the Scots Grays.
But that wasn't really the same kind of thing.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 21, 2009 12:08 PM (+rSRq)
Shows my youth in that my first exposure to the Star Wars universe were the Ewoks and Droids cartoons in the late 80's (Ep 4 was out 4 years before I was born). Wierdest event at a cinema was when I went to see ep 2 at a midnight screening during my final year of uni, and 2 guys in jedi costumes had a duel in front of the screen before the programme started.
Posted by: Andy Janes at May 21, 2009 12:15 PM (fk7dT)
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at May 21, 2009 12:24 PM (/ppBw)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 21, 2009 01:29 PM (+rSRq)
I didn't get to see it until after the craze had started (just a kid with no car back then), but I was hooked as soon as the camera panned to show the desert planet from orbit, and it looked so real....
Posted by: Siergen at May 21, 2009 03:03 PM (mXN0Z)
The biggest audience cheer I've ever personally encountered was during the scene in Indiana Jones where he caps the guy with the sword.
Posted by: Toren at May 21, 2009 04:31 PM (/ykD9)
May 08, 2009
Ubu has seen the new Star Trek movie. He loved it.
UPDATE: RealLife goes to the movies.
UPDATE: Oh, brother. Jonah Goldberg really puts his foot in it. Man, is he gonna get the hate mail.
Posted by: ubu at May 08, 2009 12:53 PM (i7ZAU)
I was interested right up until I read "time travel." Larry Niven once said that to write time travel SF, you didn't need to be a good writer, you just needed a good history text.
In any SF story it's a lousy crutch, but in the Star Trek 'verse it's a pimped out electric wheelchair.
Posted by: Tiberius at May 08, 2009 03:19 PM (TXmvK)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 08, 2009 05:51 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: metaphysician at May 08, 2009 08:41 PM (WPSw+)
Posted by: mparker762 at May 10, 2009 12:48 PM (zXDHc)
May 07, 2009
It was an OK film, but definitely a creature of its time. It was during the Cold War, after all. And the main reason it was decent was because Patrick Swayze was in it. And Charlie Sheen was pretty good, too. Plus Powers Booth as the Air Force pilot who eventually trained the Wolverines and made them an effective force.
Everything I read in that post says "third rate horseshit" to me. Definitely not a film to look forward to -- assuming it gets made, which I bet it doesn't. Lots of films get to the scripting stage and go no further; it's the way the business runs.
Posted by: metaphysician at May 07, 2009 06:15 PM (WPSw+)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 07, 2009 06:26 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at May 07, 2009 08:04 PM (pWQz4)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 07, 2009 08:53 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at May 07, 2009 09:37 PM (/ppBw)
I have a bad feeling about this movie.
They can't make Americans the good guys anymore, so expect to see all sorts of angst as the Wolverines wonder if they're on the right side and also expect to see the politicians working with the enemy as thinly disguised Republicans, extra points if they get Teh Fred to play one.
Nope, Hollywood is far too political to ever allow a movie with unashamed American values free.
Heck, it would surprise me not at all if this remake is set in Iraq or Afghanistan and the Wolverines are fighting against the Imperialist Americans with Israelis playing the part of the Cuban allies.
Quick question, which one (1) movie since 9/11 has America as the good guys in the War on (Some) Terror?
Team America, the one with the non-anatomically correct puppet-sex scene.
In all the rest, we're the bad guys.
Posted by: Veeshir at May 08, 2009 07:18 AM (ThMnZ)
Yeah, the post I linked to said:
The cause of the invasion? Oil, of course. There are hints that America is kinda to blame, too. In today’s PC environment, that’s not too much of a surprise.
As you say, making America or American's heroic is just not acceptable in this day and age. Americans are supposed to doubt, apologize, and do penance. The only good Americans are anti-American Americans.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 08, 2009 09:43 AM (+rSRq)
Without getting into the politics of it all, I remember seeing the movie at the theater and laughing through the opening invasion of Colorado by the Cubans. It was the one scene where the commander stoops down and takes a pistol from a dead citizen. As he does so, we see the bumper sticker on a truck. "They can have my guns when they pry them from my cold dead hands!"
I cracked up and said to my friend "this film has to have been financed by the NRA!"
Funny how you don't see that bumper sticker around so much any more...
Posted by: ubu at May 08, 2009 09:52 AM (i7ZAU)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 08, 2009 11:04 AM (+rSRq)
I'd rather they just make a Robocop IV than rehash the original.
Posted by: Zyrkon at May 08, 2009 02:24 PM (PBdV8)
May 04, 2009
For a long time the principle has been that even-numbered Star Trek movies would be good and odd-numbered ones would be crap. Has the new Star Trek movie escaped from that jinx? It's #11, but as I write this it has 22 positive reviews and no negative ones, resulting in 100% on the Tomato Meter.
I won't see it. You can't go home. I'm no longer the high school kid who secretly watched the third season in his bedroom in the basement with the volume turned way down. (Come to think of it, for all the accusations of such things, I haven't lived in a basement since then.)
Posted by: Wonderduck at May 04, 2009 09:46 PM (/nYBT)
I still wonder if it's entirely a coincidence that I got horribly ill for two weeks after seeing it...
Posted by: ubu at May 04, 2009 09:59 PM (OYdzO)
Posted by: RickC at May 05, 2009 06:02 AM (ndqAK)
I saw it last week (sneak preview). I really enjoyed it, though I should note that I'm not a fan of the original series (but I loved TNG). I'd be curious to see what someone who loved the original series thought, as JJ Abrams did change some things. It's also more of an action movie than other Star Treks, but that worked fine for me.
With apologies for self promotion, there's a mostly spoiler free review at my blog.
Posted by: Mark at May 05, 2009 06:22 AM (aUPJJ)
Posted by: RickC at May 05, 2009 07:23 AM (ndqAK)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 05, 2009 09:12 AM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at May 05, 2009 09:36 AM (/ppBw)
Yes, but the point of the Onion's segment was that fans were bashing on it because it was good. Whether it is or not, I will know in a few days, but the point it made about TOS and TNG was spot on. The fight with the Gorn had me grinning like a madman.
And from Mark's review, I gather they're actually going to address the retelling in such a way that any canonical differences going forward are actually addressed. (Although they'll still find ways to violate canon, anyway.) I've followed it closely enough that I have an idea why, though it's a spoiler. The previews allude to it; the plot of the movie is that someone is coming back into the past -- multiple times -- to make damn sure the career (if not the life) of "the Federation's greatest captain" gets stopped before it gets started. Wonder if the Temporal Corps will be involved?
Posted by: ubu at May 05, 2009 12:29 PM (i7ZAU)
Posted by: Zyrkon at May 05, 2009 01:21 PM (PBdV8)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 05, 2009 02:17 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: RickC at May 06, 2009 07:13 AM (pKdjQ)
48 queries taking 0.1556 seconds, 172 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.