September 23, 2011
Help? Unwanted popup
Can anyone tell me how to make Win7 stop doing this?
These damned popups keep showing up. I can make them go away by sweeping the mouse pointer over them, but most of the time when I do that, they pop up again, or a different one does. They eventually go away on their own, but it takes something like 30 seconds.
I have never needed them. I have never wanted them. If this feature could be deactivated somehow, I would be very happy. Does anyone know how to do it?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Computers at
09:55 AM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 94 words, total size 1 kb.
1
http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/forum/windows_7-desktop/disable-tooltips-windows-7/f1c0d55b-6e36-4392-86f7-55d38ffe4851
Posted by: David at September 23, 2011 10:15 AM (ttXyi)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at September 23, 2011 11:20 AM (+rSRq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
September 11, 2011
uTorrent 3.0
This evening I tried upgrading from uTorrent 2.2.1 to uTorrent 3.0. After a few hours I switched back again.
I have a dedicated torrent computer which runs 24/7. I'm seeding about 200 torrents, of which maybe 20 are active at any given moment. (And that is how I've gotten my BakaBT exchange rate up to 10.7.)
When I first started doing this, I let uTorrent use as much upstream as it wanted, and Comcast capped me at 240 kbytes per second. So I set uTorrent to limit at 200 kb/s and it's been like that ever since.
With all the versions of uTorrent I've used up to 2.2.1, it's always saturated the uplink, if it possibly could. There are occasional events which can cause my uplink to falter a bit, but the vast majority of the time it's right at the rail. But with 3.0 it only averaged maybe half that.
And nearly all of what it was using was on the one-and-only download I've got running right now. I'm trying to get the 1080p raw for "Sacred Blacksmith", which has been a bit painful because there isn't a reliable seed for it. It comes and goes, but over the course of a couple of days I've managed to reach 92%. I've also done a fair amount of uploading on that torrent, and right now my ratio is 1.09.
Under 3.0, that was pretty much the only torrent I was doing any significant uploading on. There were a bunch of others where I was running maybe 2K/s, and I was running anything from 50K to 150K on this one. The rest of my bandwidth went to waste. In the few hours I tried 3.0, I don't think it ever saturated the line.
They've completely rewritten the strategy code which allocates bandwidth, somehow. I looked all the way through the configuration frames and I couldn't find anything that would make it work the way I want it to. Which is to say, to work the way 2.2.1 does, which divides the upstream evenly among every leech irrespective of the torrent they're on.
It looks like 3.0 prioritizes torrents where your exchange rate is low. And once your exchange rate tops a certain threshold, it says "To hell with those guys; what have they done for me lately" and chokes them.
So I retreated back to 2.2.1 and I'll be staying with it.
UPDATE: Actually, I did find what I think was controlling that. There was a field which defaulted to "150%" which seemed to indicate that when it reached that upload threshold (which either means 1.5:1 or 2.5:1) then it would crank back. But the documentation also said that changing that field in the setup frame would only affect new torrents. I would have needed to change all the existing ones individually -- and I have 161 running. (I used to have 220, but a couple of weeks ago I trimmed it back quite a lot.)
Manually changing the settings on 161 torrents is not my idea of a good time. That's why I retreated.
When new versions appear, if they do, I'll be watching the change history closely to see if they did something about it. But for the time being there doesn't seem to be any good reason to upgrade. It didn't look like it really offered me anything I don't already have with 2.2.1.
...so why did I upgrade? Well, the one seed on that torrent that I seemed able to connect to wasn't ever giving me any bytes. It was also running uTorrent 3.0. I wondered if they might have done something strange, and maybe if I was running 3.0 then that seed would start feeding me.
Answer: no. So there wasn't any reason to stay with it, and I retreated to 2.2.1.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Computers at
07:26 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 638 words, total size 4 kb.
1
uTorrent 2.2.1 works pretty well; I'm not sure what more I'd want out of it. Maybe an option to tell it to finish one particular file ASAP and ignore everything else until it's done.
(Always annoying when I'm downloading a long series and my viewing catches up to my downloading.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at September 12, 2011 09:22 AM (PiXy!)
2
Maybe an option to tell it to finish one particular file ASAP and ignore everything else until it's done.
What you do is to stop the other downloading torrents. It isn't that hard.
The only feature in 3.0 that looked really useful was that they'd made it easy to use for large private file transfers. Looks like it's possible to set up a 1-to-1 transfer session without using a tracker. (Though I could be mistaken about that.)
But it isn't something that comes up much for me, and when I need to send something like that to someone else, I upload it onto my server and let them download it using HTTP.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at September 12, 2011 09:54 AM (+rSRq)
3
Thanks for taking the Bullet, I think I'll stick with 2.2.1 too.
Pixy, you can set priorities on individual files in a torrent in the files panel, and you can also prioritize torrents. I think between the two you might get the effect you want.
The big issue I have with uTorrent is that when it's running, I get a LOT of timeouts and failed connections in Firefox, even if it's not even close to maxing out my bandwidth.
That and the RSS feed matching is not particularly reliable.
Posted by: Mauser at September 12, 2011 12:42 PM (cZPoz)
4
I have the latter issue with not being able to match feeds, but not so much with Firefox timing out. Of course, I'm bittorrenting off of a different computer with a very high-bandwidth pipe (18mbit) though it's still uTorrent 2.2.1. I have a hard time getting it to upload specific files; it wants to send up the last few or nothing.
Posted by: ubu at September 12, 2011 12:49 PM (i7ZAU)
5
The BitTorrent protocol is a series of transactions. If client starts hunting for a specific piece within the torrent, it may take a very long time.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at September 12, 2011 02:10 PM (9KseV)
6
Asking for specific pieces mostly just reduces the number of leeches that can share with you. It
can reduce the amount of data you get from seeds, if they're also trying to "optimize" the protocol, but in general, it works out well if you want, say, just the short omake that were inexplicably left out of a US Blu-ray release. I did this recently for
Daimaou, where I had no desire to spend days downloading the entire series to get a handful of 3-minute clips.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at September 12, 2011 02:26 PM (fpXGN)
7
Typically I'll set all the little 1k text files that self promote the various hosts (Some of which seem to have no connection other than re-tracking a series) to not download at all.
Posted by: Mauser at September 13, 2011 04:26 AM (cZPoz)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 24, 2011
Saten's keyboard
The USB keyboard just got delivered, and I'm posting this from Saten.
And now to see if I can install SimLife on it.
UPDATE: And, both SimEarth and SimLife work fine on Saten, which is running Win7 Pro 32. So if I want to run them on Alcyone, I'll have to install the XP simulator, which I'm told isn't all that hard.
Now to give it a try.
UPDATE: I've got XP mode installed, but how do I use it?
UPDATE: I created a shortcut on my desktop to the install.exe file, and used the "compatibility" tab to set it to run as "XP SP 2", but it still pops up the error about not being able to run it.
Will I have to install VirtualPC and use that?
UPDATE: I need to learn how to read manuals. "To install applications in Windows XP Mode, you start by selecting Windows XP Mode from the Windows 7 Start Menu."
UPDATE: SimEarth is working. Now for SimLife.
The installation is a bit of a pain. Virtual XP mode shows an A drive, but it isn't actually the USB floppy. That looks like a networked drive, but the Maxis installer doesn't know about those. So I had to copy each of the installation floppies onto the virtual C drive.
Alcyone has a quad core. When SimEarth is running full out, the CPU usage runs about 35%. I assume that means one core is completely dedicated to running the XP environment, and a second core is partially busy doing all the virtualization.
Of course, when you look at the Task Manager, the load is distributed among all the cores. The multitasking system distributes the load that way to avoid heating any one core up, for instance if they were physically separate chips.
UPDATE: Speaking of Windows Updates... "78 high priority updates waiting". Yeesh. I think that's only the beginning; I don't think it has any of the SPs, either.
UPDATE: Since this really is a virtualized XP machine, it means I should be able to install "Cosplay Fetish Academy" on it without having to fear that SecuRom will kill my Win7 system. I'll have to give that a try later.
A lot later. I figure I'll be spending the next two hours doing updates. I wonder what it's like when I am told I have to reboot?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Computers at
11:10 AM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 395 words, total size 2 kb.
1
At first glance, I parsed that as "Satan's Keyboard", and I pictured something with branding-iron keycaps and letters that change when you're not looking at them, attached to a system that whips you for every typo.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at August 24, 2011 11:31 AM (fpXGN)
2
I thought Satan used DVORAK? *ducks*
Posted by: metaphysician at August 24, 2011 12:04 PM (3GCAl)
3
It was kind of strange having all of a keyboard, a mouse, and a floppy drive attached to Saten. It felt like an entirely different computer.
Especially since the keyboard is twice the size of the Slate.
I'm going to leave the mouse plugged in. It's a lot more convenient than using the stylus for a lot of things.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 24, 2011 12:12 PM (+rSRq)
4
I'm just amazed that the Installers work when copied off the floppy. No copy protection scheme that prevented this from working? Cool!
Posted by: Mauser at August 24, 2011 12:41 PM (cZPoz)
5
Those were innocent times. It doesn't even have "look up the word" copy protection.
Actually, the biggest pain was setting up XP, and in particular remembering how to tell the damned security center to stop nagging me about the lack of a virus program and the fact that I have autoupdate disabled.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 24, 2011 12:53 PM (+rSRq)
6
Do you remember how Leisure Suit Larry ran a pop-culture quiz to determine user's age? Nobody in the office knew a thing about any of American celebrities referenced in there. And it was long before Google.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at August 24, 2011 01:20 PM (9KseV)
7
Leisure Suit Larry in the office? Those *were* innocent times.
Posted by: bkw at August 24, 2011 05:07 PM (34O+x)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
August 23, 2011
I can still do it...
I finally got my wifi router reconfigured for the 192.168 IP block. I had to dig out the documentation to see just how you reset it. (You use a jeweler's screwdriver and hold the "reset" button down until the "test" light starts to blink. Then you wait until it stops blinking.)
This time I wrote down all the things I did to set it up, and I've got copies of that file stashed in a bunch of places.
So now my whole LAN is back in synch. Only... Uiharu, the iPaq, still can't connect to the wifi. I have no idea why.
It isn't important, but it's annoying.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Computers at
10:20 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 113 words, total size 1 kb.
August 22, 2011
Backward incompatibility
I ordered a USB 3.5" floppy drive, which just got delivered. I found my copies of SimLife and SimEarth and wanted to see if I could install them.
Answer? No. They are Win16 programs, and Win7 no longer supports them. The installer for SimLife won't run, even when I tell it to use Win95 compatibility mode.
It occurred to me that it might be a DOS program, so I tried running it with DOSBOX. It told me the installer was a "Windows" program, which of course means Win16.
So bummer. Those two were the Sim games I most enjoyed, and I wanted to see how they ran on a really powerful computer (i.e. something better than the 486DX/50 I used to run them on. But looks like I'm SOL.
They're the kind of games I keep hoping that GOG will pick up, but it hasn't. Someone else has the rights and won't let go.
UPDATE: I also found my copy of XCOM, which is a DOS game and which I probably can run under DOSBOX. Maybe sometime I'll get motivated and try to install it.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Computers at
11:15 AM
| Comments (23)
| Add Comment
Post contains 187 words, total size 1 kb.
1
For what its worth, I know XCom *can* run under DOSBOX. Its how I played it during my brief try. It came preconfigured from where I bought it, though, so I can't give any help on that angle.
Posted by: metaphysician at August 22, 2011 01:03 PM (3GCAl)
2
Configuring DOSBOX isn't really all that tough. I'm sure that the exact same config file I currently use for MOM would work just as well for XCOM.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 22, 2011 01:32 PM (+rSRq)
3
And now you know why Bill is one of my least favorite people. I don't buy software, I just pay to lease it until Microsoft decides I don't need to run it anymore.
Why businesses put up with that kind of planned obsolescence, I'll never know. Oh, right... no choice but Steve, Bill, or DIY.
Posted by: ubu at August 22, 2011 02:00 PM (i7ZAU)
4
XCOM used a DOS mode I never seen in any other DOS games. It is obviously not a problem but it can add one more step to configuring it.
DOSBox is still one of the easier programs to use. I have been able to play DOS games without altering any configuration of DOSBox but installing DOS games might be a challenge.
I know trying to install and play certain early Windows-based games on Vista can be annoying. My copy of Alpha Centauri/Alien Crossfire required me to download the patch that made it compatiable with Windows 2000 and editing an INI file to get it working. Imperialism required fiddling too and even Galactic Civilization needed a patch. I am not looking forward to seeing what Win7 requires.
C.T.
Posted by: cxt217 at August 22, 2011 02:06 PM (iM/n3)
5
Planned obsolescence? That's not really fair. How many 68K-mac apps run on modern Apples? Bear in mind that 16-bit Windows apps will work on Win7 if you are running the 32-bit version; it's only the 64-bit OS that doesn't do it. And I don't recall what version of WIndows Steven has, but if it's Pro or higher, then he can use XP mode to run those games.
Posted by: RickC at August 22, 2011 02:30 PM (VKVOz)
6
Also, its not "planned obsolescence", its "actually making newer and better versions of software." Would you, or anyone else, tolerate using Windows 95 today? No, of course not: you want more features and better functionality. You want a more stable OS that doesn't crash every day. You want an OS that will run modern programs, and run them well.
All these things require *changing the OS*. And every time you make a change to an OS, you increase the chance of breaking *something*. There is, bluntly, no way to actually make newer and better OSes without losing compatibility with older software. The only way around it is OS emulation. Like Windows Compatibility Mode, or DOSBOX. You know, those things people actually *do* make so that legacy software can be supported.
*irk*
Posted by: metaphysician at August 22, 2011 02:34 PM (3GCAl)
7
I'm running Win7/64 Professional. I actually did download all the files for XP mode and for the virtualization system but never went to the effort to get them working.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 22, 2011 02:35 PM (+rSRq)
8
Hmmm.... the 32-bit business hadn't occurred to me. I wonder if I could get it to work on Saten? That's running Win7/32 Pro.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 22, 2011 02:36 PM (+rSRq)
9
The idea that Microsoft makes old programs fall over deliberately is flat wrong. There are people there who basically make old programs work as their major job. It's a major effort of Windows to make sure everything that ran on an older version would run on a newer version, so people wouldn't avoid buying the new version of Windows. This is especially important for their corporate clients. Most of it is maintaining old, obsolete interfaces in the Windows API so as to not break programs, but also includes patching the OS to work around bugs in third-party software not written by Microsoft.
As a matter of fact the blogger above link gets routinely castigated by commenters for not letting badly-written third-party software fall over, rather than working around it. This spawned an interesting 200-comment long debate and two followups about how to handle a bug in Samba, which only became apparent when users upgraded to Vista. (They decided to change the way Windows worked to get around the bug. Samba had already been fixed, but the bug lived in a lot of embedded systems on network-attached storage devices that couldn't be upgraded, and many of those were for home users that wouldn't know what to do anyway.)
Posted by: CatCube at August 22, 2011 04:38 PM (20436)
10
One of my ancient programs that I rely on didn't work with Win7, and a Microsoft guy found this blog and helped me get it to work.
Microsoft goes to astounding amounts of effort to maintain backward compatibility.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 22, 2011 04:48 PM (+rSRq)
11
Even Microsoft does not have the infinite resources of maintain complete backward compatibility with all its previous systems. At some point you have to say 'the resources we spend support legacy systems are no longer worth the return.' Yes, even Microsoft has to say that (And if you want XBox Live support for the original XBox, that is what they say, too.).
As someone on the Traveller Mailing List said a few months ago "To me the term is reserved for companies deliberately building systems designed to fail within a shorter time period than the lifespan of the structure would indicate."
C.T.
Posted by: cxt217 at August 22, 2011 05:22 PM (wjjIr)
12
I'd assume that EA has the rights to all the old Maxis Sim games now, and GOG
have a deal with EA and has started releasing their back catalog. So there's hope.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at August 22, 2011 06:14 PM (PiXy!)
13
The EA deal made me wonder because GoG got the rights to release Alpha Centauri. But while EA published it, Firaxis was the developer of the game. Unless Firaxis signed all the rights to the game to EA (Entirely possible.), they should have been consulted regarding the deal.
Posted by: cxt217 at August 22, 2011 07:19 PM (wjjIr)
14
The one I really miss is
Carmageddon, which won't run under Vista or Win 7. (I'm not sure about XP.)
I was really looking forward to seeing how it ran on my current desktop when I got it in 2007, but there's just no way to make it work. Not with DOSBox, compatibility mode, or anything.
So, I feel your pain.
Posted by: atomic_fungus at August 22, 2011 07:59 PM (v62gL)
15
I think it would be prohibitively difficult to even attempt to install SimLife or SimEarth on the Slate without a keyboard. So I just ordered a USB keyboard from NewEgg. When the Slate is in its stand, there are three USB ports, which means the keyboard, a mouse, and the USB 3.5" drive.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 22, 2011 08:16 PM (+rSRq)
16
GOG have just announced that their next batch of EA games will come out on Thursday, so fingers crossed! (I'd like SimTower and SimAnt myself.)
Posted by: Pixy Misa at August 23, 2011 05:58 AM (PiXy!)
17
XP Mode works pretty well right out of the box: Just run the installers. You can even shut down the VM and run installed apps so that they appear on your Win7 desktop, like Citrix seamless apps, although they aren't REALLY on the desktop, so you can't do copy-paste, for example.
IIRC the reason 16-bit apps don't work on 64-bit Windows is that AMD removed support for it from the 64-bit processor operating mode, but I'm not sure.
Posted by: RickC at August 23, 2011 09:17 AM (VKVOz)
18
Rick, if that were true then 16-bit DOS wouldn't be possible either, and I wouldn't be able to play Master of Magic.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 23, 2011 09:27 AM (+rSRq)
19
If you do get around to wanting to fiddle with X-Com I can get you my dosbox config file; there's one setting that needs to be twiddled to make it run well. I think there was a discussion about it on your site several months back that touched briefly on it.
Posted by: bkw at August 23, 2011 09:50 AM (34O+x)
20
Say one negative thing about Bill or Steve, and the world goes all durka-durka-jihad on your butt. Yes, they can't support old apps forever. Especially games. But frankly, it's not that they
can't, it's that their business model
isn't designed that way. They have to force movement in order to continue the revenue stream.
IBM was notorious back int the day for creating new software that required new computer systems every few years, but at least it was on a longer cycle: 5-10 years, IIRC. MS is running effectively 3-year cycles, with about one version backwards capability. And I'm notorious among my friends for refusing to upgrade until late in any O/S lifespan, because I believe that MS doesn't get a given release fixed until at least the time it releases SP1.
Where I work, we're having issues because some of the newest software requires Win 7, whereas our desktops are all still XP or even 2k. "Ugh!" you think? Well, we just upgraded to Office 2007 (from 2000, we skipped 2003) last year, but here's the kicker: the servers are supposedly still NT4.0! Which Win 7 won't talk to, so my nice shiny new laptop is unable to talk to our servers and a USB stick is the only way to transfer data.
Or our IT guy is just making it up because I'm cross at him for having to go through that.
Posted by: ubu at August 23, 2011 10:53 AM (i7ZAU)
21
NT 4 had USB? Are you making it all up?
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at August 23, 2011 11:58 AM (9KseV)
22
"They have to force movement in order to continue the revenue stream."
This is just nonsense. They TRY to get movement, but if what you say were true, then 16-bit programs wouldn't work under Win7 at all, nor would XP mode have been provided.
You can run NT4 if you want; I'd rather not use a 15-year-old OS that the vendor stopped patching 10 years ago and stopped patching 7 years ago.
(the mind boggles at businesses that do this; one of my company's customers uses an ancient version of HP/UX. Earlier this year they inquired about upgrading some software they license through us; after they tried to install it, they discovered the new version wouldn't work because it depends on a patch that was released in something like 2002. I'm continually amazed seeing this, let alone the people who are running unpatched software with serious bugs.)
It's not the cpu after all, as you say, Steven; Win64 doesn't ship with NTVDM, which is the VM 16-bit apps run under.
Posted by: RickC at August 23, 2011 03:51 PM (VKVOz)
23
I think this thread has gone on long enough.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at August 23, 2011 04:09 PM (+rSRq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
June 03, 2011
Indiscretionary spending
I just put in an order with Newegg for a 2TB hard drive.
Deneb, my Windows Home Server, has 2 1-TB drives and 2 2-TB drives. It's also about 3 quarters full. It shows 1.6 TB free.
Which isn't as much as it looks, because most of what I put on it gets stored twice. That's effectively 800 GB.
So if I'm going to add storage, I pretty much have to do it now. One of the 1TB drives can't be removed because it has the OS on it. The other one can, though. I can use the control panel to tell WHS to move off that drive, which would probably take hours. Once it's unused, though, I can pop it and put the new 2TB drive in that bay, for an increment of 1 TB.
That will be enough free space to make me feel comfortable again.
It's got USB ports, and I could attach external USB drives to it for additional space, but I've had bad luck with lifespans of USB drives, and I don't want to use that solution unless there is no other choice. (And, please note that this post is not a request for suggestions or advice.)
I placed the order last night, and this morning I was informed that it shipped, via 3-day ground, from Baldwin CA.
UPS's tracking system doesn't show an estimated delivery, but it will probably be Tuesday or Wednesday of next week.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Computers at
06:02 PM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 244 words, total size 1 kb.
1
The hard drive manufacturers giveth, and the torrents taketh away.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at June 04, 2011 04:47 AM (PiXy!)
2
The ultimate solution would be to roll a bunch of it off onto USB drives, and then delete it off the server.
I don't really need five different versions of Railgun, after all. (And a lot of other accumulated cruft, like partial downloads of series I gave up on.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at June 04, 2011 09:14 AM (+rSRq)
3
DVD-R is more economical than thumb drives, and possibly faster.
Posted by: Mauser at June 04, 2011 01:30 PM (cZPoz)
4
I recently reviewed some of the fansubs that I recorded to CD-R in 2003 or so, and already there was a significant rot. In Azumanga, I had to re-torrent 3 epiodes out of 26. It was not on BakaBt, phased out for DVD rips. Thank heavens for Chinese hoarders! They weren't completely junk CD-Rs, I thought. When Kodak specified PhotoCD and CD-R, they expected the life time of 100 years. But I think just about nobody in the world made CD-R blanks that good by the time 2000 rolled in. Looking at that, I do not trust DVD-Rs. I'll just store a copy locally and pay a couple of bucks for a copy in Amazon S3 cloud. The great advantage of this is that an automated process can verify SHA1 or other sums and flag any bit error for recovery. With CD-Rs, I would only know that anything rotted by the time I wanted my data.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at June 04, 2011 01:35 PM (9KseV)
5
Mauser, I don't use thumb drives. I use things like this.
That's 3TB for $160. Actually about 2.7 TB.
So 2700 gigabytes for $160 is about six cents per gigabyte. If a DVD-R is 4G, then it would have to cost less than 24 cents to be cost competitive.
And writing to the 3TB USB drive is faster and easier, and a USB hard drive doesn't suffer from bitrot to anything the same extent as optical drives.
Also please note the fine print about unwanted advice.
Another point: 2.7 TB is somewhere around 675 DVDs. How long does it take to burn 675 DVDs? Copying that much data to the USB drive takes a few hours, but burning 675 DVDs would take weeks.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at June 04, 2011 01:53 PM (+rSRq)
6
Blu-Ray and HD-DVD were *supposed* to keep opticals competitive with HDD and ahead of flash... but, my understanding is that Sony never had any real interest in supporting PC users, only movie studios (and indeed, that may have been part of the skulduggery behind the sudden demise of HD-DVD).
The result? Opticals are quickly becoming relegated to commercial movies and music, to the degree that those markets retain a physical presence (hey, they still make vinyl, for purists). I have shelves full of old CDs and DVDs I burned 10 years ago; I rarely touch them (half of them are series--full of outdated commercials--that I can stream anytime that I like from Netflix), and frankly, outside of ISOs for things like emergency disks and backup copies of online-purchased software, I don't have a whole lot of need for a burner anymore.
In another 10 years, I suspect everything important to me will be on multiple HDDs, with an extra copy zapped onto flash as needed for portability (or locked in a fire safe holding "key documents" like insurance PDFs and old tax returns).
Posted by: BigD at June 04, 2011 03:39 PM (LjWr8)
7
Hmmm, I've never had bit-rot issues before, but now I'm concerned. I wonder if there's a good program for checking file integrity on DVD's.
Before I got my 2T drive, I had to burn off any completed series I wanted to keep. Although I'm beginning to wonder, considering how cheap SATA drives are, if I should just get another, and periodically temp install it and dump things onto that. Of course, I've still got 643G free on the 1T partition my torrents are on.
On the other hand, I worry about having stuff on my drive considering how I lost everything while transitioning from Vuse to uTorrent. (I blogged about how I got it all back. I'm starting to work on reviews.)
Posted by: Mauser at June 05, 2011 09:33 PM (cZPoz)
8
Hmmm, I've never had bit-rot issues before, but now I'm concerned. I wonder if there's a good program for checking file integrity on DVD's.
I have a co-worker who... while I won't say he's documented every waking second of his childrens' lives, has a ton of pictures and video to store. He uses DVD-R backups, and verifies all the files post-write with an MD5-generating program. I don't think he's had issues with DVD-Rs going bad over time, but he has had instances where they claim to write correctly (even with the writer's "verify" option set), but are either entirely unreadable, or only readable on the drive that wrote them.
Since it has to read all the data on the disc, an MD5 generator (or any other CRC-type program) should verify a disc is still fully readable, but unless you have the original files to compare it to, you wouldn't be able to find readable-but-incorrect corrupted data that way.
Before I got my 2T drive, I had to burn off any completed series I wanted to keep. Although I'm beginning to wonder, considering how cheap SATA drives are, if I should just get another, and periodically temp install it and dump things onto that. Of course, I've still got 643G free on the 1T partition my torrents are on.
Rather than installing it in your machine (if your case makes that a time-consuming thing to do), you could get a hard drive enclosure (external drive with no drive in it) if you want to use normal desktop/laptop drives as external drives.
Posted by: Mikeski at June 06, 2011 06:43 AM (GbSQF)
9
Re: Sony and Blu-Ray, if I had to guess, their lack of interest in PC users is based in some form of misguided antipiracy effort. I'm actually half surprised they even released Blu-Ray blanks and burners to the general consumer.
Posted by: metaphysician at June 06, 2011 09:27 AM (hD30M)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 12, 2011
IE9 -- first reaction
The main thing that's immediately obvious is that Microsoft has done everything they can think of to maximize the central viewing area.
IE8 used an unconscionable amount of vertical space with big icons, entry fields, menu pull-downs, and permanent report areas. The new layout in IE9 manages to regain at least 30 vertical pixels, and that's a huge win.
The ridiculous amount of space used for overhead and graphics cruft was my biggest complaint about IE8, but it was something I was forced to live with. It's nice that Microsoft was aware of the problem, and has done something about it.
UPDATE: Well, that's interesting. None of the buttons on the text entry box work. I think I know what I have to do about that.
UPDATE: Nope, my idea was wrong.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Computers at
09:21 AM
| Comments (12)
| Add Comment
Post contains 136 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yeah, everyone's done that with the latest browser releases. On my huge 27" screen at home I don't care at all, but my notebook's screen is only 13" and it makes a real difference.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 12, 2011 09:38 AM (PiXy!)
2
I'm not hot on the disappearing footer that Firefox 4 stole from Chrome, but clearly something is afoot in the fight for the bigger area.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at May 12, 2011 10:19 AM (9KseV)
3
Steven, are you running with the tabs on the same line as the address bar, or did you move them down a row? I know the space is precious especially on a laptop but i hate a narrow address bar for some reason.
Posted by: RickC at May 12, 2011 11:42 AM (pVOtX)
4
They're on the same line, and it's fine with me.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 12, 2011 12:03 PM (+rSRq)
5
By the way, did you realize you can resize that? Just to the left of the first tab is a grabbable resize point you can slide left and right.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 12, 2011 12:06 PM (+rSRq)
6
Testing, testing, testing.
Indeed. I can do an underline using control-U, but the underline control does nothing. It doesn't even act like a button; no response when I click it.
This is rather a problem. I may have to use Firefox to do my posting. (Ick.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 12, 2011 12:18 PM (+rSRq)
7
Yeah, I knew about the resizing thing, but forgot to mention it/didn't want to make a suggestion (take your pick.)
I can confirm the buttons not working but the keyboard commands are working in the entry area.
testing Ok, turning on Compatibility Mode in the address bar makes the buttons work.
Posted by: RickC at May 12, 2011 01:46 PM (A9FNw)
8
Huh. I don't know if I ever consciously realized this or not before but in Chrome 11.0.696.65, the entire button bar isn't there. (When I checked the version #, it said it was installing a new version; once that completes, we'll see if it changes anything.)
BTW, Pixy, if you're reading, I may or may not have mentioned this before, and someone else may or may not have, but I've noticed the comment text box usually has a superfluous space in it in Chrome (but not IE9.)
Posted by: RickC at May 12, 2011 05:46 PM (VKVOz)
9
New Chrome build is .68, same issues as reported in comment #8.
Posted by: RickC at May 12, 2011 05:47 PM (VKVOz)
10
I have a new version of the editor, and I'll test it and install it later today.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 12, 2011 08:51 PM (PiXy!)
11
The new editor works great in IE9, but I need to tweak the template code a bit before we can use it. I'll get that done today.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 13, 2011 09:41 AM (PiXy!)
12
Pixy, thanks for your effort.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 13, 2011 10:49 AM (+rSRq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 09, 2011
Poser Pro 2010
The user interface has been substantially revamped, and I like it much better. This is the same renderer that Poser 7 used, but they seem to have upgraded it. And it does use all four cores. The system CPU usage spikes at 100% during a render.
Which goes blitz fast. It's impressive to watch.
I'm not so thrilled by that mesh. The face seems wrong. It doesn't look like a woman to me. For one thing, the mouth is too big. For another, the chin is much too prominent. And I think the cheeks are too fat.
The face designer has a bazillion controls to allow you to adjust stuff like that, and I only just started messing with that a bit.
But I'll load Miki, the Japanese figure I purchased a couple of years ago, into it later. She looked a lot better.
The delivery guy said that the label last Friday gave the street address for the building but not the apartment number. And there was a new label pasted on the package today.
UPDATE:
The "Miki 2" mesh looks a lot better IMHO. It looks like a girl, for one thing.
UPDATE: So far, the good: you can resize windows from any edge or corner (the windows standard). In Poser 7 you could only resize using the lower right corner (the mac standard).
The middling: when it goes CPU bound, you can actually minimize it.
At least, most of the way. I just tried using the "clothify" function on a high-res square, and right now it's completely locked up. I was able to minimize the main screen, but the "clothify" popup didn't go with it. So I used the "show desktop" function, and the "clothify" popup repainted itself.
Seems like they still don't totally understand this "multitasking" concept.
UPDATE: Whatever that was doing, it wasn't responding to mouse clicks and it wasn't using any CPU, so I gave up and killed it.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Computers at
12:22 PM
| Comments (4)
| Add Comment
Post contains 328 words, total size 2 kb.
1
My first response on seeing this was "why didn't he post a picture of one of the female models?".
-j
Posted by: J Greely at May 09, 2011 12:46 PM (fpXGN)
2
Me, too. My first reaction to that face was, "It's a guy".
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 09, 2011 01:46 PM (+rSRq)
3
Yup, the top one's totally an unintentional reverse trap.
Miki2 is better, but I think they both share an apartment at 1616 Uncanny Valley Drive, though.
(Veins visible through skin on the chest and arm: sure. Â Veins visible through skin on the chin and lower lip: huh?)
Posted by: Mikeski at May 09, 2011 07:12 PM (GbSQF)
4
That's all part of the skin texture map, along with things like the lip coloration and the beauty spots. I don't know why they include such things, but it's easy to get rid of them. The texture map is just a big TIF file.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 09, 2011 07:14 PM (+rSRq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 08, 2011
IE9?
Microsoft has rolled IE9 out on Windows Update. Will I regret the upgrade if I take it?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Computers at
10:26 AM
| Comments (3)
| Add Comment
Post contains 18 words, total size 1 kb.
1
It's faster than IE8. They say they use your GPU to accelerate rendering. Supposed to be more standards-compliant and such too.
If you don't like the tabs being on the same row as the address bar (you'll see what I mean if you try it) you can right-click on that part of the window to get a menu option to change that behavior.
Posted by: RickC at May 08, 2011 10:43 AM (VKVOz)
2
Overall, I like it. It's a much cleaner interface, and they've done a better job of segregating each tab into its own sandbox, so a javascript error doesn't pull down the whole browser. However, there are some issues/things to get used to. Based on your previous posts, I think the biggest irritation you'll have is that they've moved stuff around quite a bit. It took a few weeks to get used to the new locations of the favorites way off on the right, and I found myself hitting the "Home" button accidentally fairly often for a little while. The search functionality has been integrated into the address bar, rather than having its own field. That takes a little getting used to, as well.
I think the biggest irritation for me is that they tried to simplify the controls on the content filtering and crippled it--or maybe marketing won that battle. I have a lot more ads that pop up that IE8's filtering used to take care of. I don't know if you're still using Proximotron to cover down on that.
Posted by: CatCube at May 08, 2011 12:45 PM (20436)
3
Yeah, I use Proxomitron for that.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 08, 2011 01:00 PM (+rSRq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 06, 2011
Backups -- snore
I think it's been like a year since the last time I created an archive of all my fansubs off of Deneb. So I unwrapped the last 3TB USB drive I was keeping around and plugged it in this morning.
I had nightmares all last night about system crashes. That's what brought this all to mind.
Turns out the easiest way to do this is to have the new drive plugged into Alcyone, and to do manual copying of the files I want to archive. But we're talking something like a terabyte and a half, so it ain't gonna be fast. Probably take the whole weekend to get it done, but then I'll feel much more secure.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Computers at
09:52 AM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 120 words, total size 1 kb.
66kb generated in CPU 1.8028, elapsed 1.9031 seconds.
46 queries taking 1.8787 seconds, 144 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.