Our friend and host Pixy lives in Sydney, and it's a damned good thing. At the rate things seem to be going, Melbourne is going to burn to the ground.
I exaggerate, but only apparently a little. Victoria State is having some terrible fires, and at least a hundred people have died there already.
Inevitably someone has blamed it on global warming, or at least tried to imply that it might be related, but there's no evidence of that. That part of Australia is like southern California: fire is a natural part of the ecology.
They had terrible fires in that part of Australia a few years ago, too; I remember blogging about it. It's something that happens periodically in that kind of arid ecological system.
Grasses and annual bushes use it as a competitive strategy. They're less affected by fire than perennial bushes and trees, so a good devastating fire every few years clears out the competitors, and fertilizes the ground for the annuals. Grasses have been doing that in dry areas of the planet for millions of years.
None of which is any consolation for the families of the dead, or those whose houses have been obliterated. Huge fires are always terrifying, in a way that no other natural disaster really can be, because they're slow but inexorable.
The San Diego area had a couple of big fires while I was living there, and one really immense one since I left. In that last one, the area where I used to live had to be evacuated, though it didn't end up burning.
So why does it seem that these fires are a lot more destructive now? It's because more people are living in those areas which are fundamentally dangerous places.
Look, you build your house in the flood plain of a major river, sometimes you're going to get wet. You build your house in the middle of sage and grass in a semi-desert, sometimes you're going to burn down. Those fires have been happening since the end of the last ice age, but it's only recently that those areas have had lots of houses in them, and that's why the costs, in money and in lives, have gone up.
Another reason is perverse: we're too good at fighting fires, most of them. Lots of small fires was the norm historically, but now we rush in and put those out. That means that brush builds up in a lot of areas because small fires no longer clear it out, and once that catches on fire, nothing can put it out.
In the long run it's the same: everything burns, eventually. But if it's longer between fires, then when the fires happen they're going to be huge and especially destructive.
Anyway, I couldn't remember which of the two cities Pixy lived in, so I hit his archives and did some searching. It's Sydney. (Whew!) No reports of fires near Sydney, and a big mountain range for protection between Sydney and the area that's burning.
1
There are fires in and near Sydney at the moment (and not that far from where I live, but not any threat), but on a far smaller scale than the ones burning across Victoria.
I have family in Melbourne, but fortunately Melbourne hasn't been hit very hard either; it's country towns north of Melbourne that have taken the brunt of the damage.
Fortunately, the extended heatwave across eastern Australia - 10 days of 40C temperatures - finally broke today, and it's 15 degrees cooler, with a little rain. It's not going to put the fires out, but it will give some relief to the fire crews who have been battling both the fires and the awful heat for the past week.
Meanwhile Queensland has been hit by massive flooding. I keep seeing a report that 60% of the state is flooded - that would, for perspective, put an area the combined size of Texas and California under water.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 08, 2009 11:05 PM (PiXy!)
2
From looking at an atlas, I don't see how it could be possible for 60% of Queensland to be under water. The ocean would have to rise a long ways, and despite what Al Gore may claim, that hasn't happened yet.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 08, 2009 11:27 PM (+rSRq)
3
Seems implausible to me too. Our Prime Minister is one of the sources - he said in Parliament that 62% of Queensland is flooded - for what it's worth.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 08, 2009 11:49 PM (PiXy!)
4
Think I've found it - 62% of Queensland has been declared a disaster area. So not necessarily flooded, but affected by the floods or the related storms.
Mind you, with some areas reporting 30 inches of rain in three days, anything that's not actually vertical could end up looking pretty soggy.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at February 08, 2009 11:56 PM (PiXy!)
I'm being patriotic and doing my part for the economic recover. Which is to say, I just put in another order for anime:
Ouran High School Host Club (first half season) Yu Yu Hakusho (season 1) DBZ (season 8) Negime?! (first half season) Negima OVA ...and a Haruhi figurine
I can see that this figurine business is going to be a problem. But I'm trying to limit myself to figurines where the girl is sitting down, so that "broken foot tabs" don't ruin the figures for me, like happened with my first Hakufu figurine. (It won't stand up anymore, and there's no reasonable pose for it otherwise.)
I'm going to be curious to see just how huge it is. It's 1/4 scale, and even though she's sitting down I expect that what with the bunny ears she's going to really tower. "Bow down and worship." Or something like that. (Sure, I'll worship a gorgeous baanigaaru...)
UPDATE: I used to be able to sit like that when I was a kid. If I tried it now, I think my hips would break.
UPDATE: By the way, when I was putting in this order, I noticed that Bob has a shipping special. Ordinarily I would have used UPS ground, which is a flat rate of $13. But now it seems that Fedex 2nd Day is a flat rate of $17, and that I can't pass up.
UPDATE: And, as always, Bob's people shipped my order next business day.
1
Genshiken suggests that a short steel rod can be used to fix small, broken plastic posts (like the ball joint of a model hip). Possibly could work for you, though there's relatively more stress on it.
I was a bit worried about the same thing - if the same thing happened to a couple of my figures, there'd be no way to get them to stand up. Now that they're all in the display cabinet, that's less of a concern, though I've kept the original packaging for all of them when the next move comes around.
Lemme know how the Haruhi figure looks in person. I had my eye on the Asakura one, but like you said, 1/4 scale... that size issue is enough to keep me from going for, say, the Nanoha 1/4 scale swimsuit model. ;p
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at February 08, 2009 05:39 PM (7TgBH)
When I first saw the figure and the stand, I wondered why they didn't use steel for the peg.
But fixing it now would require coming up with a steel peg of the right diameter, and I have no idea how I'd do that. (Or brass would work, too.) I suppose I could ask my brother and he probably could come up with something, but I'm not sure I want to show him the figure. After the peg broke, I took her dress off because I was curious.
Actually, it works really well in that position -- for a hentai meaning of the word "well". My god, it's even more perverted than when she was standing on her left leg. (In fact, it works better. When she was standing up, her breasts should have been sagging off to the side, and they aren't. It almost makes me think that the sculptor was thinking of this position for her.)
And I broke the dress, so I don't think I can get it back on in any reasonable way.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 08, 2009 06:18 PM (+rSRq)
3
If the seller or the production company do not give dimensions, it's still possible to estimage. Sakaki-san was 178cm tall (to take an extreme case -- I doubt that Haruhi was any taller). A quarter of that is 44.5. Since the figure is sitting, I'd say about 3/5 of that. So, 26cm or smaller. It's lower than the lid of my laptop when open. I used to have a plush penguin that big, sitting on my desk.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at February 08, 2009 06:19 PM (/ppBw)
4
That's a nice figurine. And a nice figure on the figurine. I hear you on the figurine problem...they've been getting so well-made and so cheap I'm regularly tempted. But I fear then it'll devolve into a sleigh ride to hell and I'll end up with a cabinet full of the damn things like the pictures I see on the net of otaku bedrooms. Still, I'm sorry I didn't get the deluxe set of Azumanga Daioh figurines I saw in Tokyo. They were really well done...although not exactly cheap. The sculptor really nailed the faces. And I also saw a stunning Belldandy (with her angel Holy Bell) that is probably the nicest cast figurine I've ever seen. From the base to the top of Holy Bell's wings it was about 24". I was told it was assembled from 31 separately cast and painted parts, and had these amazing, delicate, crystal-clear acrylic wings for Holy Bell. The painting was done in Japan and supposedly took a model painter over a week for each figurine, plus three days for assembly of the parts and finishing. It was just gorgeous. It was also $900 and frankly, worth it. I figured that since I'd worked on OMG for ten years I could sort of justify it, and it would be tax deductible, too. But it was sold out, and all they had was the display model, which they refused to sell (reasonably enough).
There's hasn't been much anime I wanted to buy recently, although I made my "obligation" order for the first Clannad box.
Posted by: Toren at February 08, 2009 06:29 PM (Rp33N)
5
No, you're not using the metal post to replace the peg, you're actually boring into the currently-broken peg. Thus the metal post needs to be of a smaller diameter than the current peg anyway. (Technically you could use the metal post wherever you wanted - you can bore into the PVC of the figure as easily as the peg - but with her up on one foot like that, you probably are better off using the original brace position.)
The real question is, how sturdy is the base? Since the metal post won't be an integral part of the base, and it will be solidly anchored into the figure by the broken peg, all the stress is going to be on the post-base interface. Again exacerbated by Hakufu being up on one foot like that, though it's not as bad as Signum or Vita, where the support isn't under the center of gravity to start with.
But yeah, this sort of thing can quickly turn into an engineering project, and frankly, it might not be worth doing, especially if you've got to deal with the dress being broken too.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at February 08, 2009 06:33 PM (7TgBH)
6I used to be able to sit like that when I was a kid. If I tried it now, I think my hips would break.
Due to an unfortunate encounter with a patch of ice resulting in a farked-up knee, I can't even think about bending my leg into that position. Just looking at it make my knee ache.
Posted by: Wonderduck at February 08, 2009 07:59 PM (sh9fy)
7
Bless anime for keeping the bunny costume alive!
Bless Japanese no chair customs for keeping the girls flexible.
I wonder if there is going to be enough figurines sold to keep a professional anime figure repairmen alive. "Why haven't you repaired her yet?"
"Oh she's been repaired for a week, I just, just, couldn't seem to call you and see her leave."
Posted by: toadold at February 09, 2009 07:44 AM (zcbXo)
When the Haruhi series was announced for R1 release, there was some fear here that Playboy would cause trouble. That's because the bunny costume that Haruhi wears in the series is a Playboy trademark. (J wrote about that at the time.)
But they didn't do anything, which is a relief. (Kadokawa probably could have claimed that the use of it in the anime was social commentary, and that it didn't dilute the Playboy brand, but legal hassles still could have tied up the series for years.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 09, 2009 08:52 AM (+rSRq)
9
Hmmmm yes these days it seems you'll be sued withing an inch of your life if you "violate" a trade mark by walking by it. On the other hand if I was Playboy Inc. I'd welcome anything that would keep interest in the company alive. I haven't checked lately but Playboy hasn't doing all that well. If I was king of the world I'd suggest they get with one of the better anime companies and do something like "Bunny space commandoes!" See them spike the aliens with their high heels as the aliens are stunned by the bunnies cleavage.
Posted by: toadold at February 09, 2009 09:37 AM (zcbXo)
10
Playboy is in deep trouble right now (dropping to 11 issues this year), but they've sent in the lawyers over use of the bowtie-bunny before, most relevantly with the Dirty Pair comics. When Haruhi first hit the US, they were in the middle of reestablishing their presence in Las Vegas, making prominent use of the bunny suit, so I considered it a very real possibility.
I'm actually surprised they didn't, because of the way trademark law works: failure to actively defend your mark can lead to genericide. They may be worried that the long history of generic use in Japan (3D as well as 2D) would count against them in the US, and they'd lose the trademark completely.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at February 09, 2009 09:47 AM (2XtN5)
11
Wonderduck made me try it. It hurts a lot, and I cannot be sure how well I approximate Haruhi without a sideways shot. I hope Steven takes one, then we'll know.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at February 09, 2009 10:03 AM (/ppBw)
12
My problem is that my thigh muscles are too large. My knees just won't bend that far, and even less bent than that they cut off all circulation below the knees.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 09, 2009 10:53 AM (+rSRq)
13
I have no doubt that there are dozens of postures that could be safely assumed by a youthful Haruhi that would cause me extreme pain. ;p
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at February 09, 2009 06:41 PM (pWQz4)
14
Some of that is sexual dimorphism. Women (bless 'em) can do things with their legs that men cannot, because their pelvises aren't the same.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 09, 2009 06:55 PM (+rSRq)
15
j, Yes, indeed, Playboy sent us a cease-and-desist over the use of bunny girl costumes in one issue of the second series. They wanted all the profits, and the remaining issues destroyed. In an unbelievable stroke of luck, about two weeks later I met someone with access to Christine Hefner and we were able to get her to call off the lawyers. But we still had to go through the entire issue and remove the bunny ears on all the original art so we could publish the collection. You see generic bunny girls all the time in Japanese pop culture, but not in the US media, so I suspect Playboy still slaps down people who try it on their home turf. But as long as our access to cute anime/manga/figurine bunny girls is not interfered with, we won't have to storm the Playboy HQ with torches and pitchforks.
Posted by: Toren at February 09, 2009 07:11 PM (Rp33N)
16
I wonder whether Playboy gave Kadokawa any trouble about the R1 Haruhi DVD releases? (Maybe they didn't notice.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 09, 2009 08:22 PM (+rSRq)
17
If they noticed our obscure little comic 20 years ago then by god they must have noticed Haruhi and all the other gazillion bunny girls, the way manga and anime have quasi-mainstreamed since then. Which I why I think they might have just decided to let it ride in Japan. I do know they lost the exclusive right to the magazine title "Playboy" in Japan due to their differences in copyright law. So maybe they just gave up, as odd as that would be for an outfit like them.
Posted by: Toren at February 09, 2009 09:23 PM (Rp33N)
18
Maybe you answered the question there. It's easy to send cease-and-desist letters to obscure little comics. Taking on large, faceless Japanese corporations with next to no presence in the US, favorable rulings in their own nation, and revenues several times your own? A different proposition. (Or maybe they did, and nobody at Kadokawa even paid attention? Heh.)
Filing trademark and copyright lawsuits is a lot more expensive than sending letters, as we've noted before. In the face of someone who's too big (and absent-minded) to intimidate, who really isn't interested in your core market anyway? And who you don't have to worry about "generic-izing" your brand, because of the convenient fig leaf of differing national jurisdictions? Yeah, I can see why they might not bother.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at February 09, 2009 09:29 PM (7TgBH)
19
I can understand why they wouldn't go after Kadokawa for the R2 release (Japan, Singapore etc.). Now about the R1 release?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 09, 2009 09:37 PM (+rSRq)
From our discussion here a couple of days ago about Strike Witches and how well it's sold, I've been thinking about just why that might have been. What is different about SW compared to some other Gonzo series that haven't done as well?
"Doing well" as far as the Japanese studios are concerned means how many DVDs they sell in Japan. As I understand it, they don't break even on broadcast. The networks don't pay them as much as their production costs. And R1 sales, if a series get licensed here, is so late as to not really figure very much in their economic calculation. (Plus the fact that American fans are cheap, and the market here isn't all that large, means that it isn't really all that much money.)
So the Strike Witches DVDs have been selling at a rate of maybe 12,000 each for their first weeks, which doesn't set any records for the industry, but which makes it Gonzo's best selling title ever.
ANN doesn't list the totals for many DVDs in their rankings, and they only started doing that a few months ago anyway, so I don't have much data here to work with. But consider:
Strike Witches 1
10961
Strike Witches 2
13158
Strike Witches 3
12400
Strike Witches 4
13291
Strike Witches 5
11910
The most obvious reason is the fan service, and the fact that the DVDs are uncensored. But SW is far from being the only title that's been done for. Sekirei did, too, but it hasn't sold as well.
Sekirei 1
8212
Sekirei 2
7648
Sekirei 4
7269
I wish I could compare it to other recent series which are similar (e.g. Goshushou-sama Ninomiya-kun, or Rosario to Vampire) but I can't come up with any sales data for them.
Anyhoo, it's at least obvious that it's selling a lot better than Sekirei, which has to have at least as much fan service and girls fighting as SW does.
So what is it that's special about Strike Witches?
Here's where we get out of the objective and into the subjective. I'll tell you what it is that makes it work for me.
First, I really like the music. That may be surprising to hear, but there's something about martial music, and the general style of music that they chose for this series, which stirs the blood.
And I like the period. It's one I'm interested in, even though they're taking massive liberties with it.
The magic is neat. The variety of magic, and the way the magic is presented. The Striker Units are wonderful; stupid, but wonderful.
But the real reason the show works for me is the characterization. All the girls are good, but the characters of Miyafuji and Sakamoto make the show. They're both really interesting, and the interaction between them is also really interesting.
Sakamoto is the real prize character in the series. The fact that she's an extremely experienced pilot. The way her eye glows when she lifts her eye patch. Her strange laugh, and the way she keeps hitting Miyafuji on the shoulder. Her gung-ho attitude.
And the somewhat tragic story that gets told about her. There are several different intertwined stories being told here, but in the end I think that the series is really about Sakamoto, and the way she has to face the fact that at age 20 she's over the hill.
Sakamoto is a nerd. Her social skills are terrible, yet deep down she's a good person, an amazingly good senior officer, a skilled warrior, and...
...and a flying fool. She loves to fly. She loves being in the air. And she can't let go of that, even when flying will get her killed.
So is the series selling well because of characters, or because of fan service? Sales of the 6th and final DVD will tell the story. That'll be episodes 11 and 12, and they have the least amount of fan service in the entire series. If the Japanese are buying for the nudity, then that DVD won't sell as well as the others. But if it's really the story and characters, then it'll sell just as well as the others.
And that's what I expect. And that's why it's outselling Sekirei: that one doesn't have any equivalently riveting characters.
UPDATE: And just after I wrote this, I saw that Pete had posted about ep 8, which he just purchased from Crunchyroll. He's right; that episode is a particularly good one.
The furball in it is one of the best combat sequences in the series, and they animated it very well. That was the first time we got to see Perrine use her magical attack, which was cool. And I think it was the first battle we saw where Miyafuji was treated as a full member of the team, and did her job and did it well. In particular, her gunnery was excellent.
But seeing Wilcke in that evening gown was also nice, and hearing her singing "Lili Marleen" was good too. (That was the perfect choice for a song for her to sing, by the way.)
UPDATE: Pete responds. He explains why he preferred Sekirei to Strike Witches. (He doesn't explain why Strike Witches sold better.)
1
Well, objectively, it's an established franchise. (Yeah, yeah, just a series of figures. But that counts for something, at least.)
It's also something genuinely interesting -and- massively pandering at the same time. Gonzo's done massively pandering; they've done genuinely interesting; but usually they don't both go together. The two elements plus interest from the mecha musume fans (and most of the alternatives being pretty shoddy, especially in storytelling) are enough to explain how it's managing to sell okay.
For a while, US licensing was a big part of the economic calculation; for some shows, as much as half the total budget. But that's gone back down some recently (not because individual shows are getting cheaper, though there's some of that, but also because not everything is getting snapped up, so the licensor can't be sure that they'll get any of that at all.)
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at February 07, 2009 08:39 PM (7TgBH)
2The networks don't pay them as much as their production costs.
As far as late night anime like Strike Witches goes, the networks don't pay them anything - it's usually quite the opposite, infact, with the studios paying for the airtime.
Posted by: DiGiKerot at February 07, 2009 09:16 PM (UNZ2Z)
3
In that case, the studios get to sell the advertising, right?
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 07, 2009 09:47 PM (+rSRq)
4
Somebody knew their WW II air warfare history real well, even down to non-combat time off activities in that series. So for me their was this strange feeling of watching a historical recreation draped in the folds of fantasy and science fiction both. I kept thinking about a comment made by an American Army Officer about WW II, "Most of the actual fighting was done by teen-agers."
If parents signed permission kids as young as 16 went in. Then their were those that lied about their age and went in a young as 12.
Posted by: toadold at February 08, 2009 02:25 AM (zcbXo)
Chizumatic friend Sixten has had his blog hacked by someone who claims to be a "palisenian". Presumably our brave freedom fighter counts this as a major victory in his war against the Juice.
Why, exactly, Sixten should be a victim in this war isn't clear. Last time I checked, Sixten was of Korean descent and lived in Seattle. (Did he secretly enlist in the Juice Defense Fierces?)
But, I guess, brave Palisenians must take their victories where they can find them, the dumbasses. They sure are brave, ain't they?
UPDATE: In comments, J points out that visiting Sixten's site while its content is under hostile control is probably not very safe. For the moment it doesn't seem to do anything bad, but those who broke in before could do so again and make it try to do nasty things.
UPDATE: 20090207.2300 and he seems to be trying to fix it. That's good to see.
UPDATE 20090208.0745: I just heard from him. Looks like it's a total loss, and he's created a new blog from scratch. That's really unfortunate. (I recommended that he talk to his hosting service to see if they can restore his site from backups.)
He also says he's from the Philippines, not from Korea. (My mistake.)
1
You should mention that it's still hacked, and that clicking the link is a bad idea, due to possible malware. It doesn't look like there's any in this case (just links to streaming audio of Arabic music and some Javascript from a Chinese site that doesn't exist), but there's no reason to trust them...
-j
Posted by: J Greely at February 07, 2009 04:00 PM (2XtN5)
2
The admin of one of the gun related forums I go to has pretty much banned any traffic from Russia , Eastern Europe, all of Africa except S. Africa and most Asian sites because there have been so many spam and hack attempts from those locations recently.
Posted by: toadold at February 07, 2009 04:33 PM (zcbXo)
3
There have been times when I've given serious consideration to blocking all of China in my firewall, because of all the unmannerly crawlers from there which have hammered my server on occasion.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 07, 2009 05:36 PM (+rSRq)
4
The only time Ani-nouto was breached, the attack came from China (SQL injection into the search box).
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at February 07, 2009 06:16 PM (/ppBw)
Based on the scan: Taeko seems to have an uncanny ability to hold her liquor. Tina had a bottle of everclear (I assume it was) and gave a glass of it to Taeko who drank it all and didn't seem affected by it. Then Tina pressured Kaoru into trying some, and just one mouthful put him out cold. There have been other cases where Taeko has been drinking and hasn't passed out.
Talk about a dusty trope: "male lead works part time jobs to make the money for a gift for the main girl love interest, who mistakes his busyness and thinks it means he's got another girl." This show? Yes, but also the Ah! My Goddess! OVA, from waaaaay back in 1993.
Aoi in a modern white dress is nearly unrecognizable.
So how much progress am I making on an update to the top rotation? Not very much, sadly. The problem is that most of the stuff I've bought in the last year doesn't offer much I can use. So far I've got:
Aika R16 -- 15 Blue Dragon -- 5 Dokkoida -- 27 Familiar of Zero -- 28 Nanoha -- 33 Nanoha A's -- 67 Please Twins -- 11 Puniechan -- 32 Rocket Girls -- 19
for a total of 237. And I won't even be able to use all those; that's just the count of the raw frame grabs, and I always end up tossing a few. Since I shoot for somewhere in the range of 750 images total, that wouldn't even be a third new. Not enough.
Then, today, it hit me: I never scanned Ai Yori Aoshi for frame grabs. I bought the whole series, 8 DVDs, and only watched the first one,but I can grab images from all of them, and should be able to come up with 100 without too much eye fatigue.
And I've never taken frame grabs from Kaleido Stage. For that matter, if I'm just looking for eye candy, Daphne in the Brilliant Blue has a lot of it. (But it might be too ecchi, as in NSFW for all you people who visit me when you should be working. So maybe I can't use that one.)
Anyway, I'm going to start scanning Ai Yori Aoshi this evening.
UPDATE: Whoops! I missed the 70 frames I took from the first Aria series. That brings me up to 307, which is still not enough after all this time.
UPDATE:
Yeah, I think I can use this. I only got about four grabs from the first DVD, but it'll pick up once more of the girls from the harem enter the show.
UPDATE: OK, about 30 from the first three DVDs. That's more like it.
1
About how many times does the picture rotation repeat before you refresh it? I come here a couple times each day, but I don't recall ever seeing a repeat...
Posted by: Siergen at February 07, 2009 01:41 PM (syMpe)
It's currently 713 images, and it steps once per hour. So it takes 29 days 17 hours to cycle. Which means that if you visit at about the same time every day, it would take about 3 months before you'd have a chance of seeing the same image again.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 07, 2009 01:51 PM (+rSRq)
No one will accuse Ah! My Buddha! of being great art, but it is a pleasant fan-service show, and it has one virtue: the original mangaka seems to have learned how to draw girls from the same source as the mangaka responsible for Ninja Nonsense.
The girls are all round. (Even the little undeveloped one has reasonable curves everywhere else.) This is what anime girls should look like. They shouldn't look like they're made of sticks. (See Maria-sama ga miteru, or rather, don't see it.)
UPDATE: Borderline NSFW below the fold. (Better safe than sorry.)
1
The girls ARE cute, that's for sure. The show didn't do much for me, though. I gave up about episode 8. I hear the second season is better, but I don't have much enthusiasm for checking it out. I'll wait and see if you watch it and what you say. SDB, test pilot for anime fans everywhere!
Posted by: Toren at February 06, 2009 02:43 AM (MMWJT)
Murray is crazy. We're all crazy, too, of course, but Murray's craziness is cooler than ours.
Where we're all crazy about anime, Murray's craziness is siege engines. If anyone ever builds a castle in New Zealand, they're gonna be in big trouble once Murray finds out.
He's built quite a few siege engines over the last few years. There were several he was commissioned to build for a local museum, but he doesn't just want to look at them. He wants them to work.
He's built all kinds of different ones, of different sizes, and they all work. But the big gun of medieval siege artillery is the trebuchet. And that's his latest creation.
He named it Sir Isaac. His ammunition is balls of concrete (brilliant, I say; using concrete for that is absolutely brilliant) and Sir Isaac can hit a 6*6 foot target consistently from a range of 300 feet. He's got the pictures to prove it. (The repeatability is really outstanding for an indirect-fire weapon.)
UPDATE: I just noticed that James also linked to this lot. Different web site, though, but it's the same group of crazies.
ANN says that the fifth DVD of Strike Witches just came out in Japan, and the series is continuing to sell at the healthy rate of the previous disks, if not even better: almost 12,000 copies.
It's widely believed that this series saved Gonzo as a studio. Had it not been a success, the rumor is that the owners would probably have cut way back and started producing hentai. As it is, they cut back but not waaay back, and they're continuing to produce anime. (There are those who think this is not such a good thing, and poop to them.)
I think it's highly likely this series will eventually get licensed for R1, but I'm not expecting an announcement anytime soon. If we see an announcement during 2009 I'll be very surprised.
One thing on that chart that confuses me, though: it says that the release is by Kadokawa. I don't understand the business interrelationships in this industry. The series was done by Gonzo, so how does Kadokawa figure in it?
If they own the release rights (maybe that's what's going on?) then that's interesting, because they've been releasing titles in R1 under their own imprint (see "The Melancholy of Haruhi Suzumiya") and maybe, just maybe, they might do the same with this series. And maybe, just maybe, that means we might see it sooner than late 2010, which is my best guess right now.
I can dream, can't I?
On the other hand, Strike Witches isn't anything like the phenomenon that Haruhi was, so maybe it's not seen as so urgent. (Also, the market has changed a lot since then.)
1The series was done by Gonzo, so how does Kadokawa figure in it?
Gonzo did the production on the series, but it's not like they have their own video label or anything, nor would they be financing the series entirely off their own backs. Presumably Kadokawa is part of the mysterious production group for this series, co-funding the production in exchange for the home video distrobution rights in Japan (by contrast, the other Gonzo show at the moment, Linebarrels of Iron, is distrobuted by JVC).
I kind of suspect that Strike Witches, and a lot of the other recent Gonzo shows, will probably never see an R1 license. These studios claim that fansubs hurt their sales, particularly of niche titles. Given these shows have not only been available to legally download for a fee, but also to watch completely free via streaming sites, and are likely to remain their for the forseeable future. I can't see any R1 label wanting to take on that kind of risk.
Posted by: DiGiKerot at February 05, 2009 03:39 PM (UNZ2Z)
Yes, it's true that SW was released here for pay download (I bought it) but we got the censored versions. I haven't seen any sales figures for BOST and/or CrunchRoll for R1 paid downloads, but I think they did reasonably well, selling hardsubbed censored versions.
Given the assumption of decent sales here for the censored versions, and given the good sales of the uncensored DVDs in Japan, I don't see any reason to think they wouldn't want to try to milk the R1 market as well for a second pass.
I'd buy the DVDs if they came out here.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 05, 2009 03:46 PM (+rSRq)
3
Niche title - "action series fans who aren't put off by the whole no pants thing". Plus the whole "second bite at the apple" problem with fans who already paid once to see the show.
It's not necessarily a killer; in 2004 I think it would have been picked up. But the market here is a lot slower now, and even good shows are sitting around with nobody picking them up; the only big player in the market at the moment is still digesting their last mouthfuls, and everyone else is battening down the hatches. It's not a good time to take a risk on a marginal title.
It COULD get cheap enough, but Gonzo is strapped for cash; how many shows can they give away? Especially given that Strike Witches is their most-lucrative title at the moment. For that matter, we don't have any idea how their contract with Crunchy affects the idea of DVD licensing or even if that's allowed.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at February 05, 2009 06:45 PM (7TgBH)
4
For those of us not in the loop... what did Gonzo do to goof themselves up so badly in the first place?
Posted by: BigD at February 05, 2009 10:23 PM (LjWr8)
Produce lots and lots of lousy series. It's not really too complicated.
Strike Witches and Vandread are their two big successes, and it was a lot of years between them. If you look at their CV for the ones that say "Animation Production", you won't find many there which are reknowned. But you'll find quite a few which are reviled (cough Dragonaut).
Everybody works for everybody else at various times, and Gonzo has done animation work for others on shows that were decent such as Kaleido Star. But their own series mostly were not all that hot.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 05, 2009 10:34 PM (+rSRq)
6
I think Last Exile was a credible attempt at breaking the bad streak, but they did not have the will to stick to it. It will be sad if Strike Witches turns out a one-off (although I like the Druaga, it's no masterpiece).
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at February 05, 2009 11:03 PM (/ppBw)
The problem is that coming up with hit shows is hit-or-miss, as it were. Some studios have a better record at it than others, but everyone produces stinkers, and it's not always easy to tell why one series is a hit and another one is not.
Certainly there was nothing about Strike Witches as a concept which obviously would make it a big hit. Fan service, action, lots of girls; it's not like those things are rare in anime. But a lot of shows like that don't hit big.
There was a chemistry in SW which I think made it work. I don't think it was just the nudity and pandering.
Whatever it was, Gonzo hasn't been very good at finding it in their other attempts. Why was Strike Witches a hit, and Dragonaut was junk? (If the answer is "Loli nudity" then we're all doomed.)
Whatever it is, Gonzo clearly doesn't know. Which is why they don't have the kind of reputation that attaches to Kyoto Animation or J.C. Staff, or even Gainax. Nor are they doing as well as those studios.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 05, 2009 11:25 PM (+rSRq)
8
Last Exile was also Gonzos 10th Anniversary Project - they spent way more money and got way more indulgent on it than they probably should have. They couldn't really do that with every production.
Kaleido Star was actually in-studio Gonzo rather than something they just did animation work for - I seem to remember them having actually set up a sub-brand for producing shows aimed at girls for it's production, then promptly did nothing else with it.
I think the big problem with Gonzo is that, up until Strike Witches, they focused heavily on the kinds of shows which sold better outside Japan than in their own country. This was fine until the bottom started falling out of the licensing market a couple of years back. Some of their recent productions (SW in particular) seem like a deliberate attempt to appeal to the home market.
That said, I do think Gonzo have produced more decent shows than most give them credit for, but the genres are pretty disparate and largely outside of what I'd except your field of interest to be. Gankutsuou, their SF version of The Count of Monte Cristo, is particularly outstanding, but they've lots of productions like Full Metal Panic, Gate Keepers, and Kiddy Grade that, at worst, were at least entertaining.
Posted by: DiGiKerot at February 05, 2009 11:38 PM (UNZ2Z)
Kiddy Grade had excellent production standards. The character designs were interesting, the animation was competent, and the CG was amazing.
The problem there was the writing and the characterization. And in fact a lot of Gonzo's shows are like that, with really good production values and very iffy writing.
If you compare them against J.C. Staff, they just don't measure up. J.C. Staff has a lot of shows which are a lot better than anything Gonzo ever did IMHO: Sugar, Potemayo, Azumanga Daioh, Someday's Dreamers, among others.
They've got a lot of shows which are comparable to Gonzo's best, which would be considered second tier for J.C. Staff, like the Shana series, the Slayer's series.
J.C. Staff has had its turkeys, too (Maburaho) but I trust the brand a lot more than Gonzo. It seems like every season one of the shows that gets a lot of buzz is from them, and sometimes more than one. Right now, for instance, A Certain Magical Index is one of theirs.
Gonzo just doesn't manage that as consistently.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 05, 2009 11:53 PM (+rSRq)
10
At some point I was reading the list at the ANN link posted above and wanted to argue that Gonzo was not _that_ bad. Then I looked at J.C. Staff's equivalent list. It's not just Azumanga and Someday's Dreamers, but also Ai Yori Aoshi, Nodame, Potemayo, Toradora (same seazon with Index! -- just how much talent do they employ?). There is an obvious difference in the density of good shows between the two lists.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at February 06, 2009 07:22 AM (/ppBw)
11
Basically that. Gonzo churned out moderately-good action show after moderately-good action show, interspersed with crappy action shows. Not a lot of real hits in there.
But it's got to be more than that. Plenty of animation studios have a "meh" average and get along fine. Maybe they're just overspending?
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at February 06, 2009 09:37 AM (7TgBH)
The other day when I was visiting the Asian food store to replenish my supply of Pocky, I saw something else that looked interesting. It was being sold in single-serving boxes and in 10-packs, so I bought a single-serving box of each of the two flavors. They're little filled cookies, and the brand name is "Hello, Panda":
I was out again today and decided to drop by the store and buy more of them, and this time I got the 10-packs, as you can see. They're quite tasty and make a good snack.
What I don't understand is why Sanrio hasn't taken off after this lot with spiked baseball bats and lawyers. According to the package, it's from Singapore and maybe the trademark laws are different there.
The company making it is "Meiji Seika (S) Pte. Ltd." and it may be the only manufacturing company in the free world at this point which doesn't have a corporate web site.
According to this, it's a subsidiary of the Japanese company.
But it doesn't look as if they have put the official corporation name (as printed on the box) anywhere on the web site, which is why my google search came up empty.
(JCMiller, I don't suppose you could have been a bit less rude about that, could you?)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 05, 2009 12:33 AM (+rSRq)
6
Apologies. As I should have been able to foresee, what was intended as irreverence came across as rudeness.
Posted by: jcmiller at February 05, 2009 01:01 AM (IvEAM)