May 02, 2010

EULA

You gotta read 'em...

Posted by: Steven Den Beste in linky at 01:10 PM | Comments (7) | Add Comment
Post contains 5 words, total size 1 kb.

1 My wife insisted on installing some NBA app on my iPhone last night during dinner (she had forgotten to bring hers). When I clicked on "install", the iPhone informed me that the terms and conditions for the app store had changed and insisted that I read and agree to the new terms before proceeding.

At the bottom of the screen I saw the fateful words "page 1/96".

Needless to say, I didn't read them before clicking "agree".

Posted by: Anachronda at May 02, 2010 01:30 PM (LD+ZJ)

2 And now they own you.

Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 02, 2010 02:01 PM (+rSRq)

3 "Show me the man, and I will show you his crime."

Posted by: Big D at May 02, 2010 02:17 PM (LjWr8)

4 I seem to recall reading somewhere that, because users don't really have a choice about EULAs and (more importantly) don't have the legal training to understand what's in them even if they do slog through all that boilerplate, that EULAs are arguably unenforceable. At any rate, unless there's an article I'm missing, this comic appears to be taking a lazy, unprovoked potshot at a popular target; I'm a bit mystified that they didn't go after somebody who REALLY has a history of abusing EULAs, like Microsoft or Zynga...

Posted by: Alex Gray at May 02, 2010 02:42 PM (0VvtC)

5 ...this comic appears to be taking a lazy, unprovoked potshot at a popular target...

What's that sickly stench I smell?  Could it be the smug, self-satisfied odor of an Apple Fanboy?

Posted by: Wonderduck at May 02, 2010 04:28 PM (JWQqT)

6 What's that sickly stench I smell?  Could it be the smug, self-satisfied odor of an Apple Fanboy?

Nice to make your acquaintance, too. And not that you'd have any way of knowing, but no. At any rate, judging by what makes the tech news, Apple is more interested in lawyer-bludgeoning third-party developers rather than customers, whom they are content to price-gouge the way any provider of a seemingly inelastic good would be tempted to do.

Posted by: Alex Gray at May 02, 2010 04:47 PM (0VvtC)

7

Alex, it's topical because it's a reference to the SWAT raid on that Gizmodo writer. (And yes, I'm aware that the EULA doesn't apply to that case. So is the cartoonist.) Also, I like "lazy, unprovoked potshots at a popular target" when the target is Apple. (You may not realize how long and deep has run my utter hatred of all things Applish.)

Meanwhile, I'd like to remind everyone that we're all friends here. I won't tolerate my readers taking potshots at each other in my comments. You wanna fight, take it outside.

Thread closed.

Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 02, 2010 06:25 PM (+rSRq)

Hide Comments | Add Comment

Enclose all spoilers in spoiler tags:
      [spoiler]your spoiler here[/spoiler]
Spoilers which are not properly tagged will be ruthlessly deleted on sight.
Also, I hate unsolicited suggestions and advice. (Even when you think you're being funny.)

At Chizumatic, we take pride in being incomplete, incorrect, inconsistent, and unfair. We do all of them deliberately.

How to put links in your comment

Comments are disabled. Post is locked.
7kb generated in CPU 0.024, elapsed 0.032 seconds.
20 queries taking 0.0245 seconds, 24 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.