1 Test test test

2 Is there some sort of problem? (Besides the problem of Australian bluenoses?)

3 It's not illegal - but the censors are banning it anyway.

4

Are you sure? That article I linked to said that the story about censorship was mistaken.

5 Yep.  There's a lot of weaselry going on - our censors and their supporters are abject weasels.

Small breasts are not banned per se.  But "publications which contain offensive [where offensive apparently includes unclothed] depictions or descriptions [!] of persons who are or appear to be persons under the age of 18 (whether they are engaged in sexual activity or not) must be classified RC".

RC stands for "refused classification", meaning that the material cannot be imported or sold in Australia.  (Though it's not illegal to own.)  And the ACB has stated that they do use breast size in judging whether persons "appear" to be under the age of 18, and refuse classification on that basis, even when there's documentary evidence that the actress/model is over 18.

They've even refused classification to films where the character was under 18 but the actor or actress was over 18.

6 I have to say, if the Aussie censors ever stumble across Sankaku Complex, their heads will explode.