July 19, 2015
I keep running into the fact that the word "immortal" has two meanings that aren't necessarily all that closely related. One meaning is approximately "ageless" -- it means the person doesn't grow old. The other is "unkillable" -- it means the person cannot die.
In anime we run into both kinds. Yukikaze in Dog Days is immortal in the first sense. We know that tochigami can die because her mother did die, leaving her alone in the forest, where Brioche found her.
Ban in Nanatsu no Taizai is immortal in the second sense; at various times he's been chopped into pieces, burned to ash, and came back. The second kind of immortality usually implies the first kind as well; Undead Ban doesn't seem to be aging.
This comes up in mythology, too. The Norse Gods were immortal in the "ageless" sense, but one of their myths involves one of those gods (Baldr) dying after he thought he had become unkillable.
I think I'm going to stop using the word "immortal" and use "ageless" or "unkillable" instead in order to eliminate that ambiguity, unless I want to imply uncertainty. (Brioche in Dog Days is ageless, but is she also unkillable? Not known. So I will refer to her as "immortal".)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in General Anime at
09:36 AM
| Comments (10)
| Add Comment
Post contains 214 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Boviate at July 19, 2015 03:27 PM (XRvFv)
Posted by: Siergen at July 19, 2015 04:19 PM (4pDXl)
I dunno. Being unkillable without being unaging sounds hellish to me. As you get older and older and more and more feeble, it's going to be terrible.
But being unaging also sounds pretty hellish to me. Watching friends and loved ones age and die; making new friends and then watching them in turn age and die.
And boredom would be terrible, almost poignant. After a couple of thousand years, what could there be to do that you hadn't done a hundred times before?
I think immortality would be just about the worst curse imaginable.
Alan E. Nourse wrote a book which included a story about immortality. The basic hook was that they had discovered how to make people immortal, and the government decided it would only bestow that "blessing" on great scientists, great artists and composers and writers, and the like.
The main character in the story was someone who was picked for this, and refused it. Because he noticed that the people who got it became perfectionists and never finished anything.
I hope the human race never achieves immortality. One problem with it is that it means people like Fidel Castro would live forever. In our world, if there's no other way to get rid of maggots like that we can at least outlive them. But if they are immortal, then what?
But an even more important reason: if it becomes widespread, necessarily that would mean no more children.
And a world without children would be a world not worth living in.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at July 19, 2015 04:56 PM (+rSRq)
The Misenchanted Sword made use of the "unkillable but not unaging" problem, and between Highlander and all the vampire series, the problems of the unaging have pretty much been milked dry. And of course the central problem of Time Enough For Love is giving an immortal a reason to live (and I must admit, as lifelines go, "boinking hot redheads" is a pretty good one).
-j
Posted by: J Greely at July 19, 2015 11:07 PM (ZlYZd)
In the anime Strike the Blood there's a character named Vatler who is a vampire and whose main character motivation is that he's bored stiff and looking for things to entertain himself. Sometimes he helps the good guys and sometimes he impedes them, entirely as a function of how complicated and exciting he can make the situation.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at July 20, 2015 06:47 AM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Ben at July 20, 2015 07:28 AM (EdhH3)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at July 20, 2015 09:41 AM (+rSRq)
Banks' Culture had a population which was effectively ageless, but society tended towards "allow yourself to age gracefully and die in the mid-four-or-five-hundreds" though anything from instant suicide to complete functional immortality (both senses) was available.
Unkillable is -hard- for science to do; if you can do unkillable, then at that point any aging you do is purely voluntary.
Ageless works a lot better in an environment where scarcity is at a minimum. Ageless plus Earth-only turns into dystopia scenarios right quick.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at July 20, 2015 04:34 PM (pWQz4)
That would not be productive.
Posted by: The Brickmuppet at July 20, 2015 05:18 PM (ohzj1)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at July 20, 2015 05:30 PM (+rSRq)
Enclose all spoilers in spoiler tags:
[spoiler]your spoiler here[/spoiler]
Spoilers which are not properly tagged will be ruthlessly deleted on sight.
Also, I hate unsolicited suggestions and advice. (Even when you think you're being funny.)
At Chizumatic, we take pride in being incomplete, incorrect, inconsistent, and unfair. We do all of them deliberately.
How to put links in your comment
Comments are disabled.20 queries taking 0.0107 seconds, 27 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.