February 13, 2009
åŒèªžå復 dougohanpuku is Japanese for "tautology", according to the dictionary.
UPDATE: I see that Pete doesn't know how I'm using the term "tautology". In sentential logic, a tautology is a statement whose truth derives from the structure of the statement, irrespective of the specific items to which it refers. "A=A" is a true statement for all A, and that makes it a tautology.
The opposite of a tautology is a "contradiction", which in logic is a statement which is false because of its structure e.g. "A = not A". That statement can never be true no matter what A refers to.
UPDATE: Apparently the correct term for sentential logic is "Propositional Calculus".
UPDATE: Better examples: "A or (not A)" is always true irrespective of the value of A. "A and (not A)" is always false. The former is a tautology, the latter is a contradiction.
UPDATE: Lewis Carroll (pen name for Charles Lutwidge Dodgson) was a mathematician who taught Logic at Oxford. The Alice books are much prized as children's tales, of course, but they're also treasures for mathematicians because Carroll sprinkled them with jokes that are particularly funny to those who have studied logic or epistemology. The White Knight is generally considered to be an author insert, and the math jokes are particularly rife in this section:
`You are sad,' the Knight said in an anxious tone: `let me sing you a song to comfort you.'`Is it very long?' Alice asked, for she had heard a good deal of poetry that day.
`It's long,' said the Knight, `but very, very beautiful. Everybody that hears me sing it -- either it brings the tears into their eyes, or else -- '
`Or else what?' said Alice, for the Knight had made a sudden pause.
`Or else it doesn't, you know. The name of the song is called "Haddocks' Eyes."'
`Oh, that's the name of the song, is it?' Alice said, trying to feel interested.
`No, you don't understand,' the Knight said, looking a little vexed. `That's what the name is called. The name really is "The Aged Aged Man."'
`Then I ought to have said "That's what the song is called"?' Alice corrected herself.
`No, you oughtn't: that's quite another thing! The song is called "Ways and Means": but that's only what it's called, you know!'
`Well, what is the song, then?' said Alice, who was by this time completely bewildered.
`I was coming to that,' the Knight said. `The song really is "A-sitting On A Gate": and the tune's my own invention.'
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in linky at
08:29 PM
| Comments (2)
| Add Comment
Post contains 425 words, total size 3 kb.
From what I remember of the subject, the major difference between Dodgson's method of analysis and what we do today is his treatment of "All x are y" statements. He clung to the Aristotelian view that "All x are y" is equivalent to the two statements "No x are not-y" and "Some x are y". Modern systems drop the latter.
Posted by: Mark A. Flacy at February 15, 2009 04:24 PM (Iw3Tx)
That approach to logic was based on set theory, and like the syllogism before it the problem wasn't that it was wrong. The problem was that it was unwieldy.
The development of the sentential calculus (which was loosely based on Boolean algebra) made both of the other approaches obsolete because it was much more versatile, and far more convenient to use.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at February 15, 2009 05:31 PM (+rSRq)
Enclose all spoilers in spoiler tags:
[spoiler]your spoiler here[/spoiler]
Spoilers which are not properly tagged will be ruthlessly deleted on sight.
Also, I hate unsolicited suggestions and advice. (Even when you think you're being funny.)
At Chizumatic, we take pride in being incomplete, incorrect, inconsistent, and unfair. We do all of them deliberately.
How to put links in your comment
Comments are disabled. Post is locked.21 queries taking 0.0107 seconds, 19 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.