May 10, 2016
Denial
Nope, no terrorism here. No Islamic extremism, either. Nothing to worry about; go on about your business. All is well.
A man with a knife attacked a train station in Germany. One man dead (alas, not the attacker) and three others wounded. The attacker has been captured. While he was attacking he shouted "Allahu Akbar!" and "You infidels must die!".
German authorities are perplexed about his motive (it definitely is a mystery, isn't it?), but one thing they're absolutely certain of is that it had nothing to do with Islamic extremism. Nope, nothing like that here.
This always happens. The only thing the authorities seem to be concerned about is preventing backlash. I guess it's a bit more understandable for Germany right now, given that it's occupied by a huge Muslim invasion. If there was actual backlash it could escalate massively, leading to war in the streets.
That would obviously be a tragedy, but it would also be a major source of schadenfreude...
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Weird World at
01:17 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 164 words, total size 1 kb.
Acronym danger
Back in the 1970's, during the ill-fated push for the Equal Rights Amendment, a running joke in some circles was that "ERA" stood for "Earned Run Average".
I'm running into something like that now. Every time I see "BLM" I think "Bureau of Land Management" instead of "Black Lives Matter".
Here in Oregon the Bureau of Land Management is a pretty big deal because it owns about a quarter of the state. The Feds own about half the state total, and the part that BLM doesn't own mostly belongs to the Forest Service. (There's also one moderate size National Park, and a rather large reservation under the nominal control of the Bureau of Indian Affairs.)
Now most of what BLM operates could accurately be called "God-forsaken wasteland"; it's basically the Mojave Desert and the Great Basin Desert and a bunch of other deserts. Letting the Feds own it is not a real burden because no one else would want that land. (Not even the Indians, because there's no water there, or not very damned much.)
But BLM has been around for decades and in the western part of the US it's a big deal nearly everywhere. Wikipedia says that BLM controls 1/8 of the landmass of the US, fully a million square kilometers and nearly all of that is in the western states. So it bugs me a bit when eastern know-it-alls usurp that acronym for a transient political movement which will be consigned to the history books within ten years.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Weird World at
01:05 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 253 words, total size 2 kb.
May 09, 2016
Are weeaboos now politically correct?
"White Swedish Girl Tells College Students She's Japanese—Lunacy Ensues As They Try To Tell Her That's Ok".
I guess that means it's OK for all of us to pretend we're Japanese.
Pretend? Pretend? We are Japanese, by damn!
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Weird World at
01:44 PM
| Comments (13)
| Add Comment
Post contains 43 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Yes! Despite official records which claim that I am an old, overweight, white man, I am
clearly a Japanese school girl! Here, let me find a picture of myself in my school uniform...
Posted by: Siergen at May 09, 2016 01:47 PM (De/yN)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 09, 2016 02:23 PM (+rSRq)
3
I should try that line on my doctor next year when she wants to do a prostate exam. "Gender is a social construct; there's no vas deferens between male and female!"
-j
Posted by: J Greely at May 09, 2016 02:42 PM (ZlYZd)
4
That deserves today's Scarecrow Award for punsmanship.
Posted by: Mikeski at May 09, 2016 02:53 PM (rKjqN)
5
I think I swiped that from the "MASH Goes to New Orleans" novel.
-j
Posted by: J Greely at May 09, 2016 03:24 PM (ZlYZd)
Posted by: Wonderduck at May 09, 2016 05:23 PM (XQ5ac)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 09, 2016 06:13 PM (+rSRq)
8
I, however, am now thoroughly traumatized. Where was my trigger warning on that?
Posted by: ubu at May 09, 2016 11:03 PM (GfCSm)
9
Males (XY) who think they're female, females (XX) who think they're male, humans who think they're vampires, werewolves, or dragons...
I consider them to all be the same thing. And I'd love to see people start calling "transgender" people "otherkin".
Posted by: BigD at May 10, 2016 11:04 AM (VKO9N)
10
There are actual cases where the chromosomes don't match the sexual phenotype.
One case of that is a mutation which prevents the testosterone receptors from working properly. If that happens in a person who is XY, they have a female phenotype (although they are sterile). But this is extremely rare.
Lefties don't like to admit it but the majority of transsexuals have serious mental problems. There are people who get sex reassignment surgery and feel much better afterwards (for example Wendy Carlos) but I read that the suicide rate is disproportionately high among those who do this.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 10, 2016 11:30 AM (+rSRq)
11
I should mention that cases like the testosterone mutation don't result in people who feel uncomfortable in their bodies. They grow up socially as female and usually only learn about their genetic issues when adult -- if they do. I saw a program on TV about a woman like that and she only learned that she was genetically XY when she was married and had trouble getting pregnant, which is impossible for someone with that mutation.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 10, 2016 11:40 AM (+rSRq)
12
The great horror of Political Correctness is that it actually institutionalizes hatred of those with issues. For all they claim to "celebrate diversity", if you took the same approach to Alcoholism, they would force the government to provide a keg of beer a week to them.
For the "transgendered", with the exception of the rare genetic mutation, they're people that have something very wrong with their body & mind, that's been warped & twisted into self-hatred. They've got the highest suicide rate of any sub-group (less depressed, alcoholism Men with a loaded gun in their hand), which is the biggest sign for something being deeply wrong.
The further problem is, now, the same "science" that thought Frontal Lobe Lobotomies was the best medical recourse now says, "you're fine! we'll even mutilate you for a price!". People in deep distress will latch onto any available option for stability, and our society now willingly gives them their own destruction.
We've already seen this play out with Homosexuals. The numbers are becoming a lot more clear on them. Congenital effects against Sex Hormones (more noticeable with Males, given the rate increase for every Son a Woman has), viral load, compromised immune system & compromised endocrine system. Like with Autism, pre-1950, most with the highest likelihood would have died from childhood diseases.
This understanding explains a whole lot of the interactions & reactions. It's why they invented a Strawman about the horrible treatment homosexuals were supposedly all being subjected to in the West. (Any historical look shows it wasn't the Christians that caused the Homosexuals much issue. You have the Socialists to blame for all of that.)
So we now, as a society, are supposed to "praise" people for highly predictable physical disorders that may or may not effect their ability to work. (Which is a really stupid bar to set, but it's the one they use now for mental disorders.) Since you're not supposed to offend anyone, you get effects like the article linked. Most everyone is a follower, so they'll follow along. And what they're following will shred our societies apart.
I'm not looking forward to the next round of civil wars in Western countries. It's been 150 years. It could be a lot messier next time.
Posted by: sqa at May 11, 2016 12:49 AM (u8o9S)
13
It's an in group/out group identification mechanism. You make willingness to assert something a marker of your group identity; The crazier it is, the better it functions as a marker, because people not in your group will naturally refuse to agree with it. If acting on it has harmful consequences, even better, because it becomes a better test of group loyalty.
Then, if you get power, you can then make asserting the contrary a crime, and thus establish the supremacy of your group, and officially suppress the out-group.
I think that's the best way to understand, for instance, punishing refusal to treat SSM as real marriage, or continuing to identify Bruce Jenner as a man. (A man who's going to be nude on the cover of Sports Illustrate, BTW. Short your stock!) It's a way for 'liberals' to identify their enemies, and attack them. That the positions they're demanding allegiance to are objectively insane only makes it work better for this.
Posted by: Brett Bellmore at May 11, 2016 02:22 AM (l55xw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
May 05, 2016
Warm and fuzzy feelings
Well, not in this post. Sorry. It's really depressing.
Obama's real goal in his presidency was to end the "American Century". The goal was to reduce the United States from being "the last remaining super power" to being just one nation among many, no more important or influential (or rich!) than any other. His foreign policy has been to damage our allies and build up our enemies, to try to level the playing field, and let the world know they cannot rely on us for anything from now on. His domestic policy has been to weaken our economy so that we are no longer the 600 pound canary in world trade.
And though he hasn't totally succeeded at this, he's left behind a huge time bomb that's going to finish the job in one year or ten or twenty: a $20 trillion national debt.
Debt service is no joke. Right now it's affordable but only because the Fed is keeping interest rates at 0%. If interest rates return to something like historical norms, say about 5%, the US Government will owe a trillion dollars a year just on debt service, before it does anything else.
That isn't economically possible on a balanced budget without ridiculous tax hikes beyond even the dreams of the most avaricious socialist, so it means that immense budget deficits will never end, which itself is a cascading failure since increasing the total debt in turn increases each year's debt service payments. And there will come a time when that is also no longer possible because no one will bid at the T-bill auctions. So the Fed will have to run the printing presses -- which in fact they're already doing, calling it "quantitative easing".
The Fed has actually been doing some of this for decades. When the board of governors think they need to increase the money supply, the way they do it is to create new money out of thin air, and use it to buy T-bills on the open market. But starting with the Great Recession, the rate at which they've been doing this has drastically increased. Part of the reason they did that was that they were trying to prevent Deflation, and they mostly succeeded. But now they can't stop or even crank back on doing this, and it's going to backfire eventually.
In the long run what this means is that the US dollar will collapse. The only question is how long it's going to take. And when it happens, it will complete the job Obama has begun, no matter who is president or which party is in power or what they think their foreign and domestic policy should be. America will suffer runaway inflation, and nothing can prevent it.
After which, the dollar will no longer be a "reserve currency" anywhere in the world, and international trade will no longer be done primarily in dollars, and there will be a lot of other consequences like capital flight, a total disruption of American foreign trade (both selling and buying), and, probably, political unrest. I'm not sure it leads to a revolution but stranger things have happened. It's not impossible it could lead to one or more wars.
The only thing I'm sure about is that it won't be pleasant, and for most of the population it will be more painful than the Great Depression was. The majority of Americans will go through a substantial decline in living standard.
By the way, the US government can't repudiate its debt. The 14th Amendment includes this:
The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned.
The US has to keep paying interest on the debt, and in the long run the only way that will be possible is with massively inflated dollars.
Anyway, this catastrophe pretty much can't be prevented. And sad to say, this is part of why I think this year's election isn't really as important as a lot of people do. We're already past the point of no return, no matter who gets elected.
UPDATE: So what should individuals do? Buying gold isn't any answer; that won't be liquid enough, for one thing. If we reach the "wheelbarrow of money to buy a loaf of bread" stage, there is one thing that will be liquid enough to be used as an alternative to cash.
Everyone should buy one or more guns, and in particular stock up on ammunition, and keep stocking up, faster than you are using it. When we reach the point where no one will accept $billion dollar notes for anything, they'll still accept a handful of 9 mm cartridges in barter. Because the utility and value of cartridges will be obvious to everyone in an environment where traditional law and order are breaking down.
I can see a time when that becomes the only useful currency in this country and the more boxes of it you have in your closet, the better off you'll be.
And if I'm wrong, you'll still be able to use that ammunition yourself or sell it to friends for whatever we will be using for money by that point.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Weird World at
07:04 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 883 words, total size 5 kb.
May 04, 2016
And so, it begins
I have to admit I'm having fun reading all the weeping and gnashing of teeth by conservatives about the fact that Cruz and Kasich just dropped out of the race, leaving Trump unopposed.
Me, I can't say I ever supported Trump. Actually, the candidate I wanted was Walker, but he dropped out last summer. But I don't think Trump is quite the full-scale disaster a lot of other people think. His bad aspects are legion and obvious and I won't bother talking about them because lots of other people will be doing so. But there are good things here, too. Let's take a look.
1. He can beat Hillary. Hillary is an astoundingly weak and vulnerable candidate and Trump hasn't let loose with the big cannons on her yet. He's saving his ammunition (and there is plenty of it) for the general election campaign. Her problems start with the FBI investigation but they don't stop there.
2. If Trump wins, he won't be in thrall to big contributors.
3. Trump is willing to fire people if he thinks they aren't performing well. Don't underestimate how important this is.
4. Trump doesn't care about bad press. He's been getting wall-to-wall negative press coverage since the campaign began and if anything it seems he loves it.
5. If Trump is elected, heads all over Europe will explode.
6. Trump is a capitalist. Yeah, he's said things about raising taxes on the rich and so on; that's the zeitgeist. But unlike someone like Sanders, Trump works for a living and has spent his whole life in the business world. Maybe he's not the best businessman on the planet (he's gone bankrupt twice, isn't it?) When it really comes down to it though, that's where his mind is.
7. Unlike Obama, Trump wants America to be strong. Obama's foreign and domestic policy during his presidency was to end the "American Century", to reduce America to being just another nation in the world. Obama wanted to strengthen enemies, weaken friends, and bring about a level playing field in the world. Trump won't do that; he likes winning and sees nothing wrong with that.
8. Trump is totally politically incorrect. He doesn't care about safe spaces or micro-aggressions; he thinks that political correctness is stupid. He says what he thinks even if it offends someone. He's willing to insult people. SJW heads will be exploding, too. I think 4 years of Trump will kill off that movement.
9. The Republican establishment is about to take it in the teeth. The voters are pissed at them and Trump is going to deliver the message to them. This was as much a vote against RINOs as it was a vote for Trump.
10. And finally: they say you can know a man by his enemies. Trump has the right enemies, as far as a lot of voters are concerned.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Weird World at
12:22 PM
| No Comments
| Add Comment
Post contains 485 words, total size 3 kb.
April 30, 2016
Just some random stuff
I'd love to try this but I don't think I could maintain a straight face. (Shamelessly stolen from Ace of Spades.)
And this is for Lewis Hamilton, who is having a world-record run of miserable luck this season in F1.
"Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times, it's enemy action." -- Auric Goldfinger
Watch your back, Lewis!
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Weird World at
04:44 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 62 words, total size 1 kb.
1
After seeing you post the panel, I went to the Foglio's website to read a little bit of Buck Godot. They took it down.
It's a shame it never did as well as Girl Genius. I like GG better, but Buck Godot was still a great comic in its own right. I'd always wanted to get the Gallimaufry arc in paperback--of course, now I'd settle for being able to read it online!
Posted by: CatCube at April 30, 2016 07:39 PM (fa4fh)
2
I bought the Gallimaufry arc when it first came out.
Slowly. Painfully slowly.
In B/W.
It was literally months between issues. It was 8 total and I think it took three years or more from start to finish.
Anyway, the color version is a lot better; the colorist put his heart into it. (And I think I read that he died shortly after it was completed.)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at April 30, 2016 08:44 PM (+rSRq)
3
I got the PSmith trade paperback, but that was the last one they put out. I think they lost money on the deal, and didn't want to take a flyer on the next ones. The coloring on PSmith was nowhere near as good as the Gallimaufry, though. I never did learn who the colorists there were; I know they're using Cheyenne Wright for GG, and I just kind of assumed that he had done the colors for BG as well.
Now that I look at that Minions one again, it seems like the kind of thing that'll get you on notalwaysright.com. I want to believe most of the stories of customers making crazy requests are people shining on the employees, but I fear that most of them are serious.
Any chance we can get persistent logins? I hate having to re-login at what seems like every other day (or sooner).
Posted by: CatCube at May 01, 2016 10:06 AM (fa4fh)
4
Per persistent logins, that's not anything I can do anything about. That's Pixy's domain. And I think he's keeping it short as an anti-spam measure.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at May 01, 2016 10:43 AM (+rSRq)
5
Cheyenne's not their original colorist--he started 3-4 "issues" in to GG.
They said to look for something related to Godot later this year, in their just-concluded Kickstarter.
Posted by: RickC at May 01, 2016 01:12 PM (FvJAK)
6
There wasn't a colorist for the first few issues of GG; Volume 2 was the first to be in color. I was under the (mistaken) impression that they had gone back and colored the Buck Godot comics later with Cheyenne.
When I go back and look at the books, that's obviously wrong; Wright didn't start as the colorist until Volume 5 of GG, it was Mark McNabb and Laurie Smith before him. That was about the time I picked up the series; I had I think two or three issues in hard copy before they went to the online-only presence (except for the collected trade paperbacks). I can't find my copy of PSmith to see who colored it.
Christ, has it really been that long? I guess so; I started reading GG when I was in my last year or so of college, and I'm now 11 years away from that.
Posted by: CatCube at May 01, 2016 02:11 PM (fa4fh)
7
CatCube - logins should last longer than that. I'll take a look.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at May 01, 2016 06:05 PM (PiXy!)
8
I've got pretty much every Buck Godot, except for a few I lost in a move. But it was obligatory: I knew him in college.
He as a great cartoonist back then, too.
Posted by: Brett Bellmore at May 02, 2016 02:45 AM (l55xw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 28, 2016
Beware the frumious panda-snatch!
A bomb threat isn't really funny no matter when or where it happens, but some are more bizarre than others.
In Baltimore there is (as I type this) a man wearing a panda suit who is threatening to blow up the building which contains the studios of the local Fox-TV affiliate.
So obviously he's a fruitcake, and it's unlikely he really has a bomb, but still the cops have to play it straight. Here's hoping no one gets shot before it's all over.
UPDATE: Apparently the worst is over. He got shot and has been taken to a hospital. There was a "device" and it's being investigated by the bomb squad.
UPDATE: His "bomb" was candy bars with wiring and a random circuit board. The flash drive he was trying to proffer turned out to contain tinfoil-hat info about astronomy.
He was shot several times by the police but hasn't died and isn't expected to.
Latest info is on this Twitter account, for the moment. At this point I would say this guy goes into the "lone nutcase" folder.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Weird World at
11:34 AM
| Comments (6)
| Add Comment
Post contains 183 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: J Greely at April 28, 2016 03:15 PM (CLiR9)
2
This is about the only place on the 'net where I would feel safe clicking on a link like that.
Posted by: Mikeski at April 28, 2016 05:01 PM (fLXV3)
3
I was a bit afraid myself.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at April 28, 2016 06:56 PM (+rSRq)
4
Imagine how relieved I felt when I found it early in the search results...
-j
Posted by: J Greely at April 28, 2016 07:11 PM (CLiR9)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at April 28, 2016 08:21 PM (+rSRq)
6
And I think we've exhausted this joke. Thread closed.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at April 28, 2016 08:37 PM (+rSRq)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 26, 2016
Yeowch!!
AP:
Thunderstorms bearing hail as big as grapefruit and winds approaching hurricane strength lashed portions of the Great Plains on Tuesday, but arrived without the destructive tornadoes that many had worried about for days.
We get hail here sometimes but it's never like that! Ours is the size of peas or smaller. Hail the size of a grapefruit is a weapon of mass destruction; cars parked outside can be destroyed. Buildings will be damaged; holes in roofs, windows out. A person hit by one of those can be injured or even killed.
This is "head for the storm cellar" weather even if there aren't any tornadoes.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Weird World at
10:42 PM
| Comments (8)
| Add Comment
Post contains 107 words, total size 1 kb.
1
Grape-sized hail can do a lot of damage. Grape
fruit-sized hail is seriously bad news.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 26, 2016 11:12 PM (PiXy!)
2
I flew through St.Louis last year, it was a day before storms with walnut-sized hail moved in. Stayed in
Crawfordsville, Indiana overnight and watched all the busted cars on TV in the motel.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at April 27, 2016 05:29 AM (YIjaw)
3
Also! Actual hail was about 50 mm in diameter. If we talk grapfrut, that's a fairly stunted fruit. I saw mandarin oranges that big.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at April 27, 2016 05:48 AM (YIjaw)
4
I don't see how hail could really get to be the size of grapefruit. I think this is hyperbole or a simple reporting mistake.
I think I want to see photos before I believe it.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at April 27, 2016 07:10 AM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at April 27, 2016 07:12 AM (+rSRq)
6
I've never seen a hail storm comprised of anything bigger than baseball-sized, but I have seen hail stones grapefruit- or softball-sized. They're usually isolated, rare stones. There was a recent storm in Wylie, TX that was mostly plum- to baseball-sized. Did approx. $1billion in damage.
Posted by: Ben at April 27, 2016 07:21 AM (DRaH+)
7
The largest I've personally experienced was penny- or dime-sized hail, and that's bad enough.
The hail we got during Stormageddon 2015, just over a year ago, was pea-sized or thereabouts.
I remember what it sounded like, hitting the roof vent for my heater... I can only imagine what it would have been like to have been outdoors in it, and I don't like what my imagination is picturing, no sir I don't.
Posted by: Wonderduck at April 27, 2016 03:39 PM (XQ5ac)
8
Got hit by a grape size hailstone once, running for shelter. It left quite a bruise, I expect I would have been hospitalized if I hadn't been able to find something to hide under.
Posted by: Brett Bellmore at April 28, 2016 02:06 AM (l55xw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 17, 2016
F1 4WD
I'm no automotive engineer. (These days I'm not really much of an engineer of any kind.) But I had a strange thought last night: how would an F1 car do if it was four-wheel-drive?
Right off the top, I came up with this:
-- It would be less reliable. Every component of a machine has a failure rate, and the more components, the greater the chance that something will fail. However, the increase in the failure rate might not be enough to matter.
-- It would make the car heavier, and thus it would not accelerate as well on straights.
-- It would corner better. If the front wheels are turned and are pulling the car, it's going to be possible to go faster through a turn. That's not so much a question of picking up time, it means the car would corner like softs when it was wearing intermediate tires. So you could get away with fewer pitstops because you spend most of your time on tires which last better.
-- And finally, there's probably a rule against it, or there soon would be. Every time anyone comes up with an interesting feature (like the six-wheel car and the vacuum cleaner car) the spoilsports at F1 outlaw it.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Weird World at
09:35 AM
| Comments (9)
| Add Comment
Post contains 211 words, total size 1 kb.
1
You're right, there is a rule against 4WD, but it
isn't for the reason you think.
Back in 1982, Williams created the FW08B, a six-wheeled chassis. Unlike the better-known
Tyrrell P34 and its four small wheels up front, the
FW08B had four wheels in the rear... and all were powered (6x4!). It never actually raced... the given reason was that it would have been a nightmare during pit stops.
The FIA was driven by the FW08B to define a F1 car as having four wheels, with the rear pair only being powered, "accidentally" eliminating more traditional 4WD vehicles at the same time.
Not all that long ago, Red Bull was asked to design their "ultimate F1 car"... and it had standard rear wheel drive. They said the weight increase for 4WD wasn't balanced by the traction improvement.
So that's probably the real reason we won't see 4WD back in F1... it's just not cost-effective anymore.
Posted by: Wonderduck at April 17, 2016 12:07 PM (XQ5ac)
2
Oh, and there's talk about bringing ground effect back into F1... maybe that'll lead back to the fancar?
Posted by: Wonderduck at April 17, 2016 12:10 PM (XQ5ac)
3
I wonder if it doesn't also have a lot to do with the aero. If you've got AWD, the power has to get to the front wheels somehow - and the nose of an F1 car isn't very substantial as it is (and the driver's compartment takes up a good chunk of that). Expanding the nose to accommodate the drive shaft, and the front suspension to actually drive the front wheels instead of just holding on to them, would probably make it harder to get as much aerodynamic grip, right? So even if you got more mechanical grip, you might lose it right back from the aero issues.
Posted by: Avatar_exADV at April 17, 2016 12:52 PM (v29Tn)
4
Av, I'm willing to bet that if you widened the nose, car designers would figure out a way to get an aero boost out of it... in effect, using the entire nose as a wing, instead of using the wing as a wing.
If you understand what I'm saying.
Posted by: Wonderduck at April 17, 2016 05:25 PM (XQ5ac)
5
Honda/Acura NSX has front traction motors, which may be an example of what's possible. They look quite small in the photographs.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at April 17, 2016 06:31 PM (XOPVE)
6
Electric drive, Pete? I bet electric drive is against the rules, too. They ban anything that looks like fun...
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at April 17, 2016 07:16 PM (+rSRq)
Posted by: Wonderduck at April 17, 2016 07:25 PM (XQ5ac)
8
Problem is they go whirr rather than vroom.
Posted by: Pixy Misa at April 17, 2016 07:59 PM (PiXy!)
9
The worlds largest RC cars, yep yep. I hate 'em.
Posted by: Wonderduck at April 17, 2016 08:25 PM (XQ5ac)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
April 14, 2016
Another proof that I'm getting old
I was just rewatching part of Mouretsu Pirates and saw a computer display that included the word "overdrive". It made me wonder how many young people today know where that term came from?
No, it doesn't refer to an electric guitar saturating its amplifier, or anything to do with electronics. That usage came later.
I remember it being used by James Blish a couple of times to refer to FTL travel, and that's how it was used in Mouretsu Pirates. But it had a real meaning in the 1940's and 1950's and it didn't have anything to do with space flight, or electric guitars.
And if you know what it was, I think that means you're old, like I am...
Posted by: Steven Den Beste in Weird World at
01:06 PM
| Comments (7)
| Add Comment
Post contains 126 words, total size 1 kb.
Posted by: Siergen at April 14, 2016 01:36 PM (De/yN)
2
I've seen a few modern uses of it for being the highest gear in an automobile, but that's it. Never made sense to me; why would it have a special name? So it makes sense if it came from somewhere else having nothing to do with Messers. Bachman and Turner, either.
Posted by: ubu at April 14, 2016 01:38 PM (SlLGE)
3
Gah! Ninja'd by Siergen!
Posted by: ubu at April 14, 2016 01:39 PM (SlLGE)
4
It did indeed refer to the highest gear in some cars, and the reason for the term is that when you're in overdrive the wheels turn faster than the engine.
It was thought up by a marketer, of course, and it was pushed because it seemed to imply "really fast". In a lot of cars with automatic transmissions, there was a special button on the console you had to push, or a special lever under the console you had to pull, to get into overdrive. I don't think there was any mechanical reason for that; it was just to make it seem special to the driver.
Like so many other "features" that didn't really make any difference except for advertising, the term eventually fell out of use.
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at April 14, 2016 02:13 PM (+rSRq)
5
An overdrive used to be a fully separate unit that was bolted to the rear of a transmission, the same way a transfer case is attached today on 4x4 vehicles with longitudinal architecture. For that reason it had a separate control, again the same as a T-case. It was possible to buy a transmission separately and attach an overdrive to it. People working on restomods do this even today. So, I don't think it ever was a marketing term, although it's possible, of course. I'm not versed in history that much. Over time, it became merged with the transmission as an overdrive gear (gearset - I think most or all of them were planetary), and then it was put under the control of the transmission itself. It became on the cusp of electronic control. At that point, the button morphed from a button that engaged the overdrive into a button that inhibited the overdrive, so that the transmission's control computer would not engage it. My jeep still has that on the 42RLE transmission.
In an odd twist of fate, the latest ZF 9-speed transmission, found in FCA and Honda products, has a whole of 4 overdrive gears. It's divided into 2 halves, linked with a dog clutch. Anything above that clutch is an overdrive. It is a fairly controversial design, to say the least.
Posted by: Pete Zaitcev at April 14, 2016 09:41 PM (XOPVE)
6
I didn't know that. Interesting!
Posted by: Steven Den Beste at April 14, 2016 09:49 PM (+rSRq)
7
You mean, that button doesn't give the ship's AI "Maximum" control over all functions, so that it can go on a homicidal rampage? I'd assumed it was a reference to the movie.
Posted by: Brett Bellmore at April 15, 2016 02:43 AM (l55xw)
Hide Comments
| Add Comment
58kb generated in CPU 0.0198, elapsed 0.3464 seconds.
44 queries taking 0.3341 seconds, 128 records returned.
Powered by Minx 1.1.6c-pink.